Accuracy Assessment of Digitized Data with Randomized Block Model
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
This study uses randomized block model variance analysis to assess factors affecting the quality of digitized data yielded by a digitizing tablet and desktop scanner. First, the geometric accuracy of a digitizing tablet and desktop scanner and the spectral response of the scanner were examined using a “calibration” reseau and a commercially available grayscale. The average planimetric positional error (μp) for the digitizer and the scanner were 0.249 and 0.119 mm, respectively. Experimental results showed that the planimetric position root mean square errors of both devices satisfy map accuracy requirements, and that scanner gray level response was homogeneous. Furthermore, this study used randomized block model variance analysis to assess factors affecting the quality of digitized data yielded by a digitizing tablet and desktop scanner. The effects of digitizing procedures for both devices were evaluated by this analysis. The ANOVA tables indicated that different map positions and widths of lines for a digitizing tablet, and the operator and scanner density for a scanner are shown to important elements in the data acquisition process.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASPRS (Am. Soc. for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing).(1985). “Committee for specification and standards: accuracy specification for large-scale line maps.”Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 51(2), 195–199.
2.
AVIOTAB Wild TA10 digital plotting table instruction manual. (1990). Wild Leitz Ltd., Heerbrugg, Switzerland.
3.
Bolstad, P. V., Gessler, P., and Lillesand, T. M.(1990). “Positional uncertainty in manual digitized map data.”Int. J. Geographical Information Syst., Hampshire, U.K., 4(4), 399–412.
4.
Brenton, J. K., Smith, J. L., and Gregoire, T. G.(1991). “Modelling and evaluating the effects of stream mode digitizing errors on map variables.”Photogrammetric Engr. and Remote Sensing, 57(7), 957–963.
5.
Carstensen, L. W. Jr., and Campbell, J. B.(1991). “Desktop scanning for cartographic digitization and spatial analysis.”Photogrammetric Engr. and Remote Sensing, 57(11), 1437–1446.
6.
Drummond, J., and Bosma, M.(1989). “A review of low-cost scanner.”Int. J. Geographical Information Syst., Hampshire, U.K., 3(1), 83–95.
7.
Fernãndez, R. N., Fabiãn, L. G., Deeds, G., and Johannsen, C. J.(1991). “Accuracy assessment of map coordinate retrieval.”Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 57(11), 1447–1452.
8.
Lai, P. C.(1988). “Resource use in manual digitization—a case study of the Patuxent basin geographical information system database.”Int. J. Geographical Information Sys. Hampshire, U.K., 2(4), 329–345.
9.
Lunetta, R. S., Congalton, R. G., Fenstermaker, L. K., Jensen, J. R., McGwire, K. C., and Tinney, L. R. (1991). “Remote sensing and geographic information system data integration: error sources and research issues.”Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 677–687.
10.
Richard, A. J., and Gouri, K. B. (1992). Statistics: principles and methods, 2nd Ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, N.Y., 541–571.
11.
SummaSketch II series drivers/utilities user's guide. (1991). Summagraphics Co., Seymour, Conn.
12.
Thapa, K., and Bossler, J. (1992). “Accuracy of spatial data used in geographic information systems.”Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 835–841.
13.
Umax Vista-S8 scanner user's guide. (1995). Umax Data Systems Inc., HsinChu, Taiwan, Republic of China (in Chinese).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1997
Published in print: Aug 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.