Reliability Measures for Correlated Observations
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
Following the pioneering work by W. Baarda, surveying engineers routinely inspect the Studentized residuals after an adjustment when high reliability is crucial. To detect outliers among uncorrelated observations, the relative magnitude between the cofactor of the residual and the corresponding (unadjusted) observation has to be checked. These ratios are commonly taken from a so-called “reliability matrix.” As other researchers have pointed out recently, the traditional approach breaks down in the case of correlated observations, and new measures of reliability have been proposed that, however, are not necessarily bounded. Therefore, we introduce a standardization procedure that guarantees our new reliability measures to fall between 0 and 1. We then show their behavior in a few simple examples, followed by a (simulated) global positioning system (GPS) application that allows these conclusions: (1) the “traditional” redundancy numbers give much too optimistic results for correlated observations; and (2) the ranking of observations according to previously recorded reliability measures may well be reversed after the standardization, making the “least-reliable” observations moderately reliable, and vice versa.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baarda, W. (1968). “A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks.”Publ. on Geodesy, Netherlands Geodetic Com., Delft, The Netherlands, 2(5).
2.
Baarda, W. (1976). “Reliability and precision of networks.”VII. International course for surveying engineering, G. Eichhorn, ed., Darmstadt, Germany.
3.
Chatterjee, S., and Hadi, A. S. (1988). Sensitivity analysis in linear regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Cook, D., and Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. Chapman & Hall, Ltd., New York, N.Y.
5.
El-Hakim, S. F.(1982). “Data snooping with weighted observations.”Int. Archive of Photogrammetry, 3(24), 126–133.
6.
Förstner, W. (1983). Reliability and discernibility of extended Gauss-Markov models. German Geodetic Com., Munich, Germany, A-68.
7.
Förstner, W.(1985). “The reliability of block triangulation.”Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 51, 1137–1149.
8.
Koch, K. R. (1988). Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., New York, N.Y.
9.
Pelzer, H. (1980). “Some criteria for the accuracy and reliability of networks.”German Geodetic Com. Munich, Germany, B-252, 55–67.
10.
Schaffrin, B. (1988). Progrettazione e Ottimizzazione del Rilievo Topografico e Fotogrammetrico de Controllo, F. Crosilla and L. Mussio, eds., Int. Ctr. of Mech. Sci., Udine, Italy, 29–59 (in Italian).
11.
Shan, J.(1989). “A fast recursive method for repeated computation of the reliability matrix QvvP.”Photogrammetria, 43, 337–346.
12.
Wang, J., and Chen, Y. (1994). “On the reliability measure of observations.”Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, English Edition, 42–51.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 3 • August 1997
Pages: 126 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1997
Published in print: Aug 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.