Fully Reversed Cyclic Loading of Shear Walls Fastened with Engineered Nails
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 3
Abstract
Fifteen shear walls, each constructed with either conventional or engineered sheathing nails, were tested under fully reversed cyclic loads. Four types of conventional nails (named 0.113, 0.113R, 0.131, and 0.148 nails) and three types of engineered nails (named EN1, EN2L, and EN2H nails) were used. Walls with EN1 nails exhibited the highest ultimate load capacity; walls with 0.148 and 0.131 nails had 18 and 26% reduction in load capacity when compared to walls with EN1 nails. The ultimate load of walls with EN2H nails, though 15% less than that of walls with EN1 nails was greater than that of any other wall. The load capacity of walls with EN2H nails was 8% greater than that of walls with EN2L nails and greater than that of walls with 0.113 and 0.131 nails by 24 and 14%, respectively. Walls with 0.113 and 0.113R had basically the same load capacity. The stiffest walls were those with 0.148 nails with stiffness 10% greater than those with EN1 nails. The stiffness of walls with EN1 nails was effectively equal to that of walls with 0.131 nails. The stiffnesses of walls with EN2L and EN2H nails were basically the same. The stiffness of walls with EN2 nails was 20 and 26% smaller than that of walls with 0.113 and 0.131 nails, respectively. Walls with 0.113R were the least stiff walls; their stiffness was 44% lower than that of walls with 0.148 nails. The displacement capacity of walls with EN1 nails was 89 and 97% of that of walls with 0.131 and 0.148 nails, respectively. Walls with 0.113 and 0.131 nails had essentially the same displacement capacity. Compared to walls with 0.113 and 0.131 nails, walls with EN2L nails had an 8% increase while walls with EN2H nails had a 4% decrease in displacement capacity. Walls with 0.113R nails exhibited the lowest displacement capacity, only 75% of that of walls with EN1 nails. Walls with EN1 nails dissipated slightly more energy than those with 0.148 nails; they dissipated approximately 16% more energy than those walls with 0.131 nails. Walls with EN2H and 0.131 nails dissipated basically the same amount of energy. Walls with EN2L nails dissipated 5% less energy than walls with EN2H and 0.131 nails. Walls with EN2L and EN2H nails dissipated, respectively, 5 and 10% more energy than walls with 0.113 nails. Walls with 0.113R nails dissipated the lowest amount of energy, 75% of that dissipated by walls with EN1 nails.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers acknowledge Stanley Fastening Systems for financial support. The assistance of Dave Anderson and his laboratory assistants is gratefully acknowledged.
References
APA. (1999). Performance rated panels, The Engineered Wood Association, Tacoma, Wash.
ASTM. (1990). Standard practice for static load test for shear resistance of framed walls for buildings, ASTM E 564–90, Vol. 04.11, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (2000). Standard specification for driven fasteners: Nail, spikes and staples, ASTM F 1667-00, Vol. 01.08, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Dean, J., Steward, W. G., and Carr, A. J. (1986). “The seismic performance of plywood sheathed shearwalls.” Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 19(1), 48–63.
Ficcadenti, S. J., Castle, T. A., Sandercock, D. A., and Kazanjy, R. K. (1996). “Laboratory testing to investigate pneumatically driven box nails for the edge nails of thick plywood shear walls.” Proc., SEAOC 5th Annual Convention, Structural Engineers Association of California, San Francisco, 389–399.
Foliente, G. C. (1996). “Issues in seismic performance testing and evaluation of timber structural systems.” Proc., 4th Int. Wood Engineering Conf., Vol. 1, New Orleans, La., 29–36.
Hall, J. F. (1996). “Northridge earthquake of Jan. 17, 1994: Reconnaissance report. Vol. 2: Wood buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 2, 125–196.
Hunt, R. D., and Bryant, A. H. (1990). “Laterally loaded nail joints in wood.” J. Struct. Eng., 116(1), 111–124.
International Code Council (ICC). (2006). International building code, Falls Church, Va.
International Committee of Building Officials (ICBO). (1997). Uniform building code, Whittier, Calif.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1983). “Timber structures—Joints made with mechanical fasteners—General principles for the determination of strength and deformation characteristics.” ISO 6891:1983(E), Geneva, Switzerland.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2003). “Timber structures—Joints made with mechanical Fasteners—Quasi-static reversed-cyclic test method.” ISO 16670:2003(E), Geneva, Switzerland.
Jones, S. N., and Fonseca, F. S. (2002). “Capacity of oriented strand board shear walls with overdriven sheathing nails.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(7), 898–907.
Krawinkler, H., Parisi, F., Ibarra, L., Ayoub, A., and Medina, R. (2001). “Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures.” CUREE Publ. No. W-02, Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, Richmond, Calif.
Lattin, P. D., and Fonseca, F. S. (2002). “Fully reversed cyclic loading of wood shear walls fasted with super sheather nails.” Technical Rep. No. CES-02-02, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, Utah.
National Evaluation Service. (1997). “Power-driven staples and nails for use in all types of building construction.” Rep. No. NER-272, Council of American Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
Rose, J. D. (1997). “Performance of wood structural panel shear walls under cyclic (reversed) loading.” Earthquake performance and safety of timber structures, G. C. Foliente, ed., Forest Products Society, Madison, Wis., 129–141.
Serrette, R. L., Encalada, J., Juadines, M., and Nguyen, H. (1997). “Static racking behavior of plywood, OSB, gypsum, and fiberbond walls with metal framing.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(8), 1079–1086.
Stanley Bostitch Fastening Systems. (2008). Hurriquake disaster resistant fasteners, ⟨http://www.bostitch.com/⟩ (date accessed August 24, 2008).
Stern, E. G., and Norris, E. B. (1996). “Nails, spikes, and staples.” Mechanical connections in wood structures, ASCE manuals and reports on Engineering Practice No. 84, Task Committee on Fasteners of the Committee on Wood of the Structural Division, ASCE, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 24, 2008
Accepted: Oct 6, 2008
Published online: Mar 1, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.