Limitations in Structural Identification of Large Constructed Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 8
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to discuss the limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures. These limitations arise due to the geometric complexity, uncertain boundary and continuity conditions, loading environment, and the imperfect knowledge and errors in modeling such large constructed facilities. In this paper, the writers present their studies on developing a mixed microscopic-structural element level three-dimensional finite-element (FE) modeling of a long-span bridge structure and its structural system identification by integrating various experimental techniques. It is shown that a reasonable level of confidence (50–90%) can be achieved with a model that is calibrated using global and local structural monitoring data with a sufficiently high spatial resolution. The reliability of the global attributes, such as boundary and continuity conditions that may be identified and simulated by means of field-calibrated models using only dynamic test results (globally calibrated models), may appear to be high (as much as 90%). However, the reliability that should be expected for local stress fields is shown to be an entirely different matter, and a calibration based on just dynamic testing would be unable to reveal the confidence in simulated local responses. This is especially true for long-span bridges, because the resolutions of the dynamic test grids are often quite sparse due to the large size of the structures. In this paper, the writers illustrate that the density, modality, and bandwidth of experimental data should be carefully evaluated and matched to the size and complexity of a constructed system before claiming that a FE model is validated. It is also shown that even more than three dozen acceleration measurement points, two dozen strain measurements, and a continuous surveillance of wind and temperature were barely sufficient for a credible structural identification of a long-span bridge.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to acknowledge the invaluable contributions to the research made by their many multidisciplinary colleagues at the Drexel Intelligent Infrastructure and Transportation Safety Institute. The research described in this paper was sponsored by the Delaware River Port Authority and the Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). The support of these agencies is gratefully appreciated. The writers would especially like to acknowledge Messrs. Box, Faust, McCulloch, and Bistline from DRPA for their collaboration. The writers also thank Drs. Chase and Ghasemi of FHwA for their continued support and interest over the years. Finally, the writers acknowledge the National Science Foundation (NSF) for various grants that supported the writers’ research on health monitoring of bridges.
References
Agbabian, M. S., Masri, S. F., Miller, R. K., and Caughey, T. K. (1991). “System identification approach to detection of structural changes.” J. Eng. Mech., 117(2), 370–390.
Aktan, A. E., et al. (1997). “Structural identification for condition assessment: Experimental arts.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(12), 1674–1684.
Aktan, A. E., Catbas, F. N., Grimmelsman, K. A., and Pervizpour, M. (2002). “A model health monitoring guide for major bridge.” Rep. to FWHA, DOT/FHWA Solicitation: Rep. DTFH61-01-Q-00072, Washington, D.C.
Aktan, E., Catbas, N., Turer, A., and Zhang, Z. (1988). “Structural identification: Analytical aspects.” J. Struct. Eng., 124(7), 817–829.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1984). “Earthquake effects on reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Publication SP-84, James K. Wight, ed., Farmington Hills, Mich.
Barrish, R. A., Grimmelsman, K. A., and Aktan, A. E. (2000). “Instrumented monitoring of the Commodore Barry Bridge.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring of Aging Infrastructure, Proc. SPIE, 3995, 98–111.
Brownjohn, J. M. W., and Xia, P. Q. (2000). “Dynamic assessment of curved cable-stayed bridge by modal updating.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(2), 252–260.
Bush, B., Gordon, R., Holland, J., Roach, J., and Thompson, D. (1999). “The SOFIA project for interdependent infrastructure modeling, simulation, and analysis.” Rep. LA-UR-99-3412, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
Catbas, F. N., et al. (1997). “Modal analysis of multireference impact test data for steel stringer bridges.” Proc., 15th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Orlando, Fla., 381–391.
Catbas, F. N., and Aktan, A. E. (2002). “Condition and damage assessment: Issues and some promising indices.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(8), 1026–1036.
Catbas, F. N., Brown, A. E., and Aktan, D. L. (2004). “Parameter estimation for multiple-input multiple-output analysis of large structures.” J. Eng. Mech., 130(8), 921–930.
Catbas, F. N., Brown, D. L., and Aktan, A. E. (2006). “Use of modal flexibility for damage detection and condition assessment: Case studies and demonstrations on large structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1699–1712.
Catbas, F. N., Grimmelsman, K. A., and Aktan, A. E. (2000). “Structural identification of the Commodore Barry Bridge.” Proc., SPIE, Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipelines IV, Newport Beach, Calif., 84–97.
Chang, C. C., Chang, T. Y. P., and Zhang, Q. W. (2001). “Ambient vibration of a long-span cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 6(1), 46–53.
Fujino, Y., et al. (2000a). “Forced and ambient vibration tests and vibration monitoring of Hakucho suspension bridge.” Transportation Research Record, 2(1696), 57–63.
Fujino, Y., Murata, M., Okano, S., and Takeguchi, M. (2000b). “Monitoring system of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and displacement measurement using GPS.” Proc. SPIE, 3995, 229–236.
Hart, G. C., and Yao, J. T. P. (1977). “System identification in structural dynamics.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., 103(6), 1089–1104.
Hudson, D. E. (1970). “Dynamic tests of full-scale structures,” Earthquake Engineering, R. L. Wiegel, ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Ibanez, P. (1972). “Identification of dynamic structural models from experimental data.” Engineering Rep. No. UCLA-ENG-7725, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Kashima, S. Y. Y., Suzuki, S., and Mori, K. (2001). “Monitoring the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge: First experiences.” Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE, Zurich, Switzerland), 11(2), 120–123.
Liu, S. C., and Yao, J. T. P. (1978). “Structural identification concept.” J. Struct. Div., 104(12), 1845–1858.
Mazurek, D. F., and Dewolf, J. T. (1990). “Experimental study of bridge monitoring techniques.” J. Struct. Eng., 116(9), 2532–2549.
Moon, F., and Aktan, A. E. (2006). “Impacts of epistemic (bias) uncertainty on structural identification of constructed (civil) systems.” The Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(5), 399–420.
Nagel, K., Beckman, J., and Barret, C. (1999). “TRANSIMS for urban planning.” Rep. No. LA-UR 984389, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.M.
Nigbor, R. L., Abdel-Ghaffar, A., and Masri, S. F. (1991). Dynamic monitoring of suspension bridges. Proc., Int. Workshop of Technologies for Hong Kong’s Infrastructure, Commercial Press, Hong Kong, 325–336.
Wong, K. Y., Lau, C. K., and Flint, A. R. (2000). “Planning and implementation of the structural health monitoring system for cable supported bridges in Hong Kong.” Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipelines IV, Proc. SPIE, 3995, 266–275.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 8 • August 2007
Pages: 1051 - 1066
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: May 30, 2006
Accepted: Jan 30, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2007
Published in print: Aug 2007
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Vinay Kumar Gupta
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.