TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2007

Multiobjective Optimization for Performance-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 10

Abstract

In order to meet the emerging trend of performance-based design of structural systems, attempts have been made to develop a multiobjective optimization technique that incorporates the performance-based seismic design methodology of concrete building structures. Specifically, the life-cycle cost of a reinforced concrete building frame is minimized subject to multiple levels of seismic performance design criteria. In formulating the total life-cycle cost, the initial material cost can be expressed in terms of the design variables, and the expected damage loss can be stated as a function of seismic performance levels and their associated failure probability by the means of a statistical model. Explicit formulation of design constraints involving inelastic drift response performance caused by pushover loading is expressed with the consideration of the occurrence of reinforced concrete plasticity and the formation of plastic hinges. Due to the fact that the initial material cost and the expected damage loss are conflicting by nature, the life-cycle cost of a building structure can be posed as a multiobjective optimization problem and solved by the ε –constraint method to produce a Pareto optimal set, from which the best compromise solution can be selected. The methodology for each Pareto optimal solution is fundamentally based on the Optimality Criteria approach. A ten-story planar framework example is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed optimal design method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong under Project No. HKUST6226/98E and was mainly based upon the research conducted in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

References

Ang, A. H.-S., Lee, J.-C., and Pires, J. A. (1997). “Cost-effectiveness evaluation of design criteria.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Optimal Performance of Civil Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, New York, 1–16.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1996). “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings—Volume 1.” ATC-40, Rep. No. SSC 96-01, Redwood City, Calif.
Chan, C. M. (2001). “Optimal lateral stiffness design of tall buildings of mixed steel and concrete construction.” Struct. Des. Tall Build., 10, 155–177.
Chan, C. M., Grierson, D. E., and Sherbourne, A. N. (1995). “Automatic optimal design of tall steel building frameworks.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(5), 838–847.
Chan, C. M., and Zou, X. K. (2004). “Elastic and inelastic drift performance optimization for reinforced concrete building under earthquake loads.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(8), 929–950.
Cheng, F. Y., and Chang, C. C. (1988). “Safety-based optimum design of nondeterministic structures subjected to various types of seismic loads.” NSF Rep., U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS No. PB90-133489/AS, Va.
Cheng, F. Y., and Li, D. (1996). “Multiobjective optimization of structures with and without control.” J. Guid. Control Dyn., 19(2), 393–397.
Cheng, F. Y., and Li, D. (1997). “Multiobjective optimization design with Pareto genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(9), 1252–1261.
Chopra, A. K. (1995). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Chopra, A. K., and Goel, R. K. (2002). “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561–582.
Coello, C. A., and Christiansen, A. D. (2000). “Multiobjective optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms.” Comput. Struct., 75(6), 647–660.
Deng, X.-G. (1993). “Prediction of earthquake damage for multi-story reinforced concrete buildings.” Earthquake-Resistance Eng., 1, 28–33 (in Chinese).
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1997). “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 273, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
Foley, C. M. (2002). “Optimized performance-based design for buildings.” Recent advances in optimal structural design, S. Burns, ed., 169–240.
Gao, X. W., and Bao, A. B. (1985). “Probabilistic model and its statistical parameters for seismic load.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vibration, 5(1), 13–22.
Greiner, D., Emperador, J. M., and Winter, G. (2004). “Single and multiobjective frame optimization by evolutionary algorithms and the auto-adaptive rebirth operator.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(33–35), 3711–3743.
Hasan, R., Xu, L., and Grierson, D. E. (2002). “Pushover analysis for performance-based seismic design.” Comput. Struct., 80(31), 2483–2493.
Kaisa, M. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Kanda, J., and Shah, H. (1997). “Engineering role in failure cost evaluation for buildings.” Struct. Safety, 19(1), 79–90.
Li, G. (1998). “Reliability and performance based optimal design for seismic high-rising structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dalian Univ. of Technology, China.
Li, G., and Cheng, G. D. (2003). “Damage-reduction based structural optimum design for seismic high-rise structures.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 25(4), 294–306.
Li, G., Zhou, R.-G., Duan, L., and Chen, W.-F. (1999). “Multiobjective and multilevel optimization for steel frames.” Eng. Struct., 21(6), 519–529.
Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. K. (2003). “Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(9), 1313–1332.
Liu, M., Wen, Y. K., and Burns, S. A. (2004). “Life cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference.” Eng. Struct., 26(10), 1407–1421.
Marler, R. T., and Arora, J. S. (2004), “Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 26(6), 369–395.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (1989). “Chinese code for seismic design of buildings.” GBJ11-89, Beijing.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. (1995). “Chinese standard for classification of seismic protection of buildings.” GB50223-95, Beijing.
Park, Y. J., and Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722–739.
Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H.-S., and Wen, Y. K. (1987). “Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings.” Earthquake Spectra, 3(1), 1–26.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). (1995). Vision 2000, performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Part 2: Conceptual framework, Sacramento, Calif.
Truman, K. Z., and Cheng, F. Y. (1997). “How to optimize for earthquake loads.” Guide to structural optimization, ASCE manuals and report on engineering practice no. 90, J. S. Arora, ed., ASCE, New York, 237–261.
Wen, Y. K., and Kang, Y. J. (1997). “Optimal seismic design based on life-cycle cost.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Optimal Performance of Civil Infrastructure Systems 1997, ASCE, New York, 194–210.
Wen, Y. K., and Kang, Y. J. (2001). “Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 330–337.
Zadeh, L. A. (2000). Advances in fuzzy mathematics and engineering—Fuzzy sets and fuzzy information granulation theory, Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing.
Zou, X. K. (2002). “Optimal seismic performance-based design of reinforced concrete buildings.” Ph.D. dissertation, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, P.R. China.
Zou, X. K. (2006). “Seismic performance design of concrete buildings with life-cycle cost optimization.” Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Structural Engineering for Young Experts, Fuzhou and Xiamen, P.R. China.
Zou, X. K., and Chan, C. M. (2001). “Optimal drift performance design for nonlinear pushover response of concrete structures.” WCSMO-4: Proc., 4th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Dalian, P.R. China.
Zou, X. K. and Chan, C. M. (2004). “Integrated time history analysis and performance-based design optimization of base-isolated concrete buildings.” 13 WCEE: Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Canada.
Zou, X. K., and Chan, C. M. (2005a). “An optimal resizing technique for seismic drift design of concrete buildings subjected to response spectrum and time history loadings.” Comput. Struct., 83, 1689–1704.
Zou, X. K., and Chan, C. M. (2005b). “Optimal seismic performance-based design of reinforced concrete buildings using nonlinear pushover analysis.” Eng. Struct., 27, 1289–1302.
Zou, X. K., Teng, J. G., De Lorenzis, L., and Xia, S. H. (2007). “Optimal performance-based seismic retrofit design of RC frames using FRP confinement.” Composites, Part B, 38, 584–597.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 133Issue 10October 2007
Pages: 1462 - 1474

History

Received: Mar 29, 2005
Accepted: Mar 13, 2006
Published online: Oct 1, 2007
Published in print: Oct 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Note. Associate Editor: Colby C. Swan

Authors

Affiliations

X. K. Zou
Project Engineer, Maunsell Structural Consultants Ltd., 18/F Grand Central Plaza, Tower 2, 138 Shatin Rural Committee Rd., Shatin, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
C. M. Chan
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China.
G. Li
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, 116024, People’s Republic of China.
Q. Wang
Structural Engineer, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, LLP, One Front St., San Francisco, CA 94111.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share