Inelastic Dynamic Behavior of Hybrid Coupled Walls
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper presents an investigation of the seismic behavior of hybrid coupled wall systems, in which steel beams are used to couple reinforced concrete shear walls. System response is studied using transient finite element analyses that account for the effect of concrete cracking, crushing, and steel yielding. Shear stresses in the concrete constitutive model are handled separately from normal stresses, which allows concrete to undergo high shear deformations without causing premature concrete crushing in the model. The developed finite element models are validated through comparisons with more refined models and test data. Suites of analyses are conducted to investigate pertinent parameters including hazard level, earthquake record scaling, dynamic base shear magnification, interstory drift, shear distortion, coupling beam plastic rotation, and wall rotation. The analyses show that hybrid coupled walls are particularly well suited for use in regions of high seismic risk.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete (318-20) and commentary (318R-02).” ACI-318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). AISC Seismic. (1997). “Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.” Chicago.
Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D.(1987). “Seismic behavior of slender coupled wall systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 113(10), 2221–2234.
DIANA. (2000). Users manual—DIANA version 7, DIANA Analysis, P.O. Box 113, 2600 AC Delft, The Netherlands.
El-Tawil, S., Kuenzli, C. M., and Hassan, M.(2002a). “Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. I: Design and modeling.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(10), 1272–1281.
El-Tawil, S., and Kuenzli, C. M.(2002b). “Pushover of hybrid coupled walls. II: Analysis and behavior.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(10), 1282–1289.
FEMA-273. (1997). “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 273/October 1997, Applied Technology Council (ATC-33 Project), Redwood City, Calif.
FEMA-302. (1997). “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regu-lations for new buildings and other structures. Part I: Provisions.” FEMA 302/February 1998, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA-356. (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” FEMA 356/November 2000, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
FEMA-350. (2000). “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings.” FEMA 350/July 2000, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
Gong, B., and Shahrooz, B. M.(2001). “Concrete-steel composite coupling beams. II: Subassembly testing and design verification.” J. Struct. Eng., 127(6), 632–637.
Harries, K. A., Gong, B., and Shahrooz, B. M.(2000). “Behavior and design of reinforced concrete, steel, and steel-concrete coupling beams.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(4), 775–799.
Harries, K. A., Mitchell, D., Cook, W. D., and Redwood, R. G.(1993). “Seismic response of steel beams coupling concrete walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(12), 3611–3629.
Harries, K. A., Mitchell, D., Redwood, R. G., and Cook, W. D.(1998). “Nonlinear seismic response predictions of walls coupled with steel and concrete beams.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 25(5), 803–818.
Hassan, M. (2003). “Inelastic dynamic behavior and design of hybrid coupled wall systems.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, Fla.
Oesterle, R. G., Aristizabal-Ochoa, J. D., Fiorato, A. E., Russell, H. G., and Corley, W. G. (1979). “Earthquake resistant structural walls—Tests of isolated walls—Phase II.” Rep. No. NSF/RA-790275, Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland Cement Association,Skokie, Ill.
Oesterle, R. G., Fiorato, A. E., Johal, L. S., Carpenter, J. E., Russell, H. G., and Corley, W. G. (1976). “Earthquake resistant structural walls-tests of isolated walls.” Rep. No. NSF/RA-760815, Construction Technology Laboratories, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Ill.
Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, Wiley, New York.
PCI Design Handbook (1999). Precast and prestressed concrete, 5th Ed. (MNL 120-99) Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
Pilakoutas, K. (1990). “Earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete walls.” PhD thesis, Univ. of London.
Popovics, S.(1970). “A state-of-the-art report: A review of stress-strain relationships for concrete.” J. Am. Concr. Inst., 67, 243–248.
Shahrooz, B. M., Remetter, M. E., and Qin, F.(1993). “Seismic design and performance of composite coupled walls.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(11), 3291–3309.
Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. E.(1997). “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthquake Spectra, 14(3), 469–500.
Sittipunt, C., and Wood, S. (1994). “Influence of web reinforcement on cyclic response of structural walls.” ACI Struct. J., 92(6).
Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S., and Sun, J. (1997). “Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project, SAC/BD-97/04.” Applied Technology Council, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, Calif.
U.S.-Japan Planning Group. (1992). “Recommendations for U.S.-Japan cooperative research program, phase 5—Composite and hybrid structures.” Rep. UMCEE 92-29, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2002
Accepted: Apr 18, 2003
Published online: Jan 16, 2004
Published in print: Feb 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.