Wind Speeds in ASCE 7 Standard Peak-Gust Map: Assessment
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 4
Abstract
The ASCE 7 peak-gust map divides the United States into two main adjacent wind speed zones that do not reflect correctly the country’s differentiated extreme wind climate. Following a request by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), CPP Inc. through Texas Tech Univ. provided information used for the development of the map and for its a posteriori justification. Using this information we show that the methodology used in the map’s development averages out real climatological differences and causes severe bias errors for the following reasons: (1) the estimation of the speeds was based on superstations, of which 80% included stations that were also contained in one or more other superstations; (2) stations with significantly different physical geography and meteorology were in many cases included in the same superstation; (3) legitimate wind speed data were omitted from data records in cases in which analyses resulted in speeds different from those postulated in the map; (4) and off-the-shelf smoothing software was used that does not account for physical geography and meteorological differences. Case studies show that the map entails severe bias errors, causing unnecessary waste due to overestimated wind loads or potential losses due to underestimated wind loads.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Society Civil Engineers (ASCE). (1993). ASCE Standard 7-93, New York.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (1995). ASCE Standard 7-95, New York.
Automated Surface Observation System (ASOS). (2001). ASOS user’s manual. it al 〈http://www.nws.noaa.gov/asos/aum-toc.pdf〉.
Cooperative Program in Wind Engineering (CPWE) (1994). Rep., Colorado State Univ. and Texas Tech. Univ., 4(2), 1–10.
CPP. (2001). Rep. prepared for Wind Engineering Research Center, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, Tex.
Peterka, J.A., and Esterday, W.S. (2001). “Non-hurricane wind speed variability.” Rep. prepared for Texas Tech. Univ. Wind Science and Engineering Research Program, Lubbock, Tex.
Peterka, J. A., and Shahid, S.(1998). “Design gust wind speeds in the United States.” Ground Water, 124(2), 207–214.
Simiu, E., Changery, M. E., and Filliben, J. J. (1979). “Extreme wind speeds at 129 stations in the contiguous United States.” Rep., NBS Building Science Series 118, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
Simiu, E., and Filliben, J. J.(1999). “Discussion of ‘Design gust wind speeds in the United States,’ by J. A. Peterka and S. Shahid.” Ground Water, 125(9), 1077–1078.
Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R. H. (1996). Wind effects on structures, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Simiu, E., Wilcox, R., Sadek, F., and Filliben, J. J. (2001). “Wind speeds in the ASCE 7 standard peak-gust map: an assessment.” Building Science Series Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 13, 2001
Accepted: May 20, 2002
Published online: Mar 14, 2003
Published in print: Apr 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.