Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 12
Abstract
A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The tests were conducted both in the laboratory and on existing structures at the Department of Energy’s Y-12 National Security Complex. The experimental data indicate that the combination of a steel frame and infill material efficiently resists lateral loads—the infilling provides significant lateral stiffness while the surrounding frame adds ductility and confinement to the overall system. The results from approximately 25 moderate- and full-scale tests on infills showed that with simulated seismic loads the frames confined the masonry, and the load-carrying capacity of the infill was considerably above the load that caused initial cracking. This finding was a significant departure from classical code approaches that assumed first cracking to be failure of an unreinforced masonry wall. The experimental program, performed for the U.S. Department of Energy, consisted of the following large-scale tests on infills: in situ airbag pressure testing, shake-table tests, and the application of quasistatic in-plane and out-of-plane drift loads. In situ and laboratory constitutive property tests were also conducted. This paper provides a summary of the overall experimental methodology and results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adham, S. A. (1985). “Out of plane response of masonry walls,” Proc., 3rd North American Masonry Conf., The Masonry Society, Boulder, Colo. 1–14.
Bennett, R. M., Boyd, K. A., and Flanagan, R. D. (1997). “Compressive properties of structural clay tile prisms.” J. Struct. Eng., 123(7), 920–926.
Bennett, R. M., Fowler, J. J., and Flanagan, R. D. (1996). “Shake table testing of structural clay tile infilled frames.” Proc., 7th North American Masonry Conf., The Masonry Society, Boulder, Colo. 497–507.
Butala, M. B., and Jones, W. D. (1993). “Material properties of hollow clay tile and existing mortar characterization study.” Rep. No. Y/EN 4687, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tenn.
Flanagan, R. D., and Bennett, R. M.(1999a). “Bidirectional behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(3), 236–244.
Flanagan, R. D., and Bennett, R. M.(1999b). “In plane behavior of structural clay tile infilled frames.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(6), 590–599.
Fricke, K. E., Jones, W. D., and Huff, T. E. (1992). “In situ lateral load testing of a URM HCT wall.” Proc., 6th Canadian Masonry Conf., Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Sask., Canada, 519–530.
Henderson, R. C., Beavers, J. E., Jones, W. D., and Schaefer, K. E. (1995). “Lessons learned From the Y-12 Plant hollow clay tile wall test program.” Proc., 5th DOE Natural Phenomena Hazards Mitigation Conf., (presentation only), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
Henderson, R. C., Jones, W. D., and Porter, M. L. (1993). “Out of plane and in-plane testing of URM Infills.” Proc., Structures Congress’93, ASCE, Reston, Va., 1433–1438.
Holmes, M.(1961). “Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Struct. Build., 19, 473–478.
Kennedy, R. P., et al. (1985). Draft Design and Evaluation Guidelines for Department of Energy Facilities Subjected to Natural Phenomena Hazards, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health, Office of Safety Appraisals, DOE, Washington, D.C.
Langenbach, R.(1992). “Earthquakes: A new look at cracked masonry.” Civ. Eng. (N.Y.), 62(11), 56–58.
Miranda, E., and Bertero, V. V.(1989). “The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985—Performance of low-rise buildings in Mexico City.” Earthquake Spectra, 5(1), 121–143.
Stafford-Smith, B.(1966). “Behavior of square infilled frames.” J. Struct. Div. ASCE, 92(ST1), 381–403.
Williamson, D. H. (1987). “Reevaluation of seismic resistance capacity of Y-12 plant facility 9206.” Rep. No. Y/EN-1871, Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc., Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tenn.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 6, 2002
Accepted: Oct 10, 2002
Published online: Nov 14, 2003
Published in print: Dec 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.