Parameters Influencing Performance of Elastomeric Bearings at Low Temperatures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 8
Abstract
Experimental research was conducted to investigate the performance of elastomeric bridge bearings at low temperatures. Full-size natural rubber and neoprene bearings were tested by specially designed test setups inside a walk-in-type environmental chamber. Steel laminated bearings were ordered with two specified shear modulus, 0.69 and 1.08 MPa. Tests were conducted at 23, −10, −20, and −30°C for a period of 21 days. The effect of cyclic compression, cyclic shear, rate of loading, type of elastomer compound, temperature history, creep, and slip coefficient on the performance was investigated. Approximately 500 shear stiffness tests were performed. Results indicated that the increase in shear stiffness at low temperature is a function of elastomer compound, temperature, and time. In addition, rate of loading, amplitude of strain, coefficient of friction, and temperature history were identified as important parameters that influence the bearing performance. Creep behavior at low temperature was significantly different from creep at room temperature but had no significant influence on the overall performance. It was shown that cyclic compression force and cyclic shear strain do not have significant influence on time-dependent stiffening (crystallization) of bearings. The results of this paper were used to develop a performance-based evaluation and acceptance criterion that is presented in a companion paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998a). LRFD bridge design specifications, 1st Ed., Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998b). LRFD bridge construction specifications, 1st Ed., Washington, D.C.
British Standards Institution. (1983). “Steel, concrete and composite bridges, part 9: Bridge bearings,” BS5400, London.
British Standards Institution. (1996). “Structural bearings: part 3: Elastomeric bearings.” prEN 1337-3, Draft Document, London.
Chen, R., and Yura, J. A. (1995). “Wax build-up on the surfaces of natural rubber bridge bearings.” Rep. No. 1304-4, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex., August, 59.
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company. (1959). Design of neoprene bridge bearing pads, Du Pont, Wilmington, Del.
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company. (1989). Dynamic compressive loading experiments. Du Pont, Wilmington, Del.
English, B. A., Klingner, R. E., and Yura, J. A. (1994). “Elastomeric bearings; Background information and field study.” Research Rep. No. CTR 1304-1, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex. 59.
Eyre, R., and Stevenson A. (1991). “Performance of elastomeric bridge bearings at low temperatures,” Third World Congress on Joint Sealing and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, October 27–31, 736–762.
Long, J. E. (1974). Bearings in structural engineering, Newnes-Butterworths, London, 162.
Murray, R. M., and Detender, J. D. (1961). “First and second order transitions in neoprene,” Rubber chemistry and technology, Division of Rubber Chemistry of the American Chemical Society, 34(2), (April–June), 668–685.
Muscarella, J. V., and Yura, J. A. (1995). “An experimental study of elastomeric bridge bearings with design recommendations,” Research Rep. No. 1304-3, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex., 180.
Nagdi, K. (1993). Rubber as an engineering material: Guideline for users, Hanser, New York, 302.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Highway Engineering Division. (1991). Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code, 3rd Ed., Toronto, Ontario.
Ritchie, D. F. (1989). Neoprene bridge bearing pads, gaskets and seals, Rubber World, Lippincott & Petto Inc., 200(2) (May), 27–31.
Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F., and Feller, T. (1989). “Low temperature behavior and acceptance criteria for elastomeric bearings,” NCHRP Rep. No. 325, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 69.
Yakut, A. (2000). “Performance of elastomeric bridge bearings at low temperatures,” PhD dissertation, Univ. of Texas, Austin, Tex.
Yakut, A., and Yura, J. A.(2002). “Evaluation of elastomeric bearing performance at low temperatures.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(8), 995–1002.
Yura, J., Kumar, A., Yakut, A., Topkaya, C., Becker, E., and Collingwood, J. (2001). “Elastomeric bridge bearings: Recommended test methods.” NCHRP Rep. No. 449, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 91.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 128 • Issue 8 • August 2002
Pages: 986 - 994
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 22, 2000
Accepted: Jan 6, 2002
Published online: Jul 15, 2002
Published in print: Aug 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.