Effect of Local Details on Ductility of Welded Moment Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 9
Abstract
The results of a 3D finite-element study of the inelastic behavior of unreinforced, flange-welded moment connections in steel seismic moment resisting frames is presented. Computer models of connection subassemblies with notch tough weld metal were developed using the general-purpose computer program ABAQUS. Several issues were addressed in the study: (1) geometry and size of the weld access hole; (2) control of inelastic panel zone deformation; and (3) benefit of a welded beam web. The analytical results provided information on basic performance and the effects of these parameters on inelastic performance, thereby furthering the current understanding of welded connection behavior under seismic loading. Based on the results, recommendations for the seismic design of connections are given. The recommendations include using a groove welded beam web attachment with supplemental fillet welds along the edges of the shear tab and a modified weld access hole geometry. The results indicate that a strong panel zone enhances inelastic connection performance, suggesting that they be used in design. The incorporation of the recommendations into a test program showed good connection ductility in the test specimens.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ABAQUS user's manual. (1999). Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc., Providence, R.I.
2.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ( 1993). “Commentary on the load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings.” Chicago.
3.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ( 1997). “Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.” Chicago.
4.
Deierlein, G. G., and Chi, W.-M. ( 1999). “SAC Task 5.5.5—Integrative analytical investigations on the fracture behavior of welded moment resisting connections.” Final Rep., John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
5.
El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T., Vidarsson, E., and Kunnath, S. ( 1998). “Strength and ductility of FR welded-bolted connections.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-98/01, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif.
6.
Engelhardt, M. ( 2000). “Cyclic testing of welded unreinforced moment connections.” Rep., University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
7.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ( 1997a). “Connection test summaries.” Rep. No. FEMA 289, Washington, D.C.
8.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ( 1997b). “Interim guidelines advisory No. 1.” Rep. No. FEMA 267A, Washington, D.C.
9.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). ( 2000). “Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings.” Rep. No. FEMA 350, Washington, D.C.
10.
Hancock, J. W., and MacKenzie, A. C. ( 1976). “On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steel subjected to multi-axial stress-states.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 24, 147–169.
11.
Krawinkler, H. ( 1978). “Shear design of steel frame joints.” AISC Engrg. J., 15(3), 82–91.
12.
Lemaitre, J. ( 1996). A course on damage mechanics, Springer, Berlin.
13.
Lu, L.-W., Xue, M., Kaufmann, E. J., and Fisher, J. W. ( 1997). “Cracking, repair and ductility enhancement of welded moment connections.” Proc., NEHRP Conf. and Workshop on Res. on the Northridge, Calif. Earthquake of January 17, 1994, Vol. 3, 637–646.
14.
Nakashima, M., Suita, K., Morisako, K., and Maruoka, Y. (1998). “Test of welded beam-to-column subassemblies. I: Global behavior.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 124(11), 1236–1244.
15.
Ricles, J. M., Mao, C., Lu, L.-W., and Fisher, J. W. ( 2000). “Development and evaluation of improved details for ductile welded unreinforced flange moment connections.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-00/24, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, Calif.
16.
Roeder, C. W., and Foutch, D. A. (1996). “Experimental results for seismic resistant steel moment frame connections.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 122(6), 581–588.
17.
SAC Joint Venture (SACJV). ( 1997). “Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing, and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-97/02, Sacramento, Calif.
18.
Stojadinović, B., Goel, S. C., Lee, K., Margarian, A. G., and Choi, J.-H. (2000). “Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 126(1), 40–49.
19.
Youssef, N. F. G., Bonowitz, D., and Gross, J. L. ( 1995). “A survey of steel moment resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge earthquake.” Rep. No. NISTIR 5625, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 9 • September 2001
Pages: 1036 - 1044
History
Received: Aug 1, 2000
Published online: Sep 1, 2001
Published in print: Sep 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.