Compression Failure of Beams Made of Different Concrete Types and Sizes
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 2
Abstract
To investigate whether the current numerical models and procedures are capable of realistically predicting compression failure of concrete structures, RILEM TC 148SSC recently proposed a so-called round-robin analysis for over-reinforced concrete beams. Beams of two different sizes made of three different concrete types (normal-strength, high-strength, and fiber-reinforced concrete) were proposed to be studied numerically. In the present paper the results of a 3D finite-element analysis are shown, discussed, and compared with the test results. The analysis was performed before the test data were available. After the experimental results were known, additional parameter study was carried out. The microplane model for concrete was employed within the framework of the crack band theory. The comparison between measured and calculated data exhibits good agreement. It is confirmed that the finite-element code based on the smeared fracture analysis is able to realistically predict compression failure of concrete beams. The results show that the relative resistance of beams made of different concrete types is not proportional to the uniaxial compressive strength. The efficiency of high-strength concrete is much lower than the efficiency of normal-strength concrete. It is shown that the size effect on the strength of normal-strength concrete beams that fail in compression is relatively small. However, the size effect on the postpeak response is stronger.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bažant, Z. P., and Oh, B. H. (1983). “Crack band theory for fracture of concrete.” Mat. and Struct., RILEM, Paris, 93(16), 155–177.
2.
Ožbolt, J. ( 1995). “Maßstabseffekt und Duktilität von Beton- und Stahlbeton Konstruktionen,” Postdoctoral thesis, Stuttgart University, Germany.
3.
Ožbolt, J. (1998). “MASA—MAcroscopic Space Analysis.” User Manual, Internal Report, Inst. of Constr. Mat., University of Stuttgart, Germany.
4.
Ožbolt, J., Li, Y.-J., and Kožar, I. (1999). “Relaxed kinematic constrained microplane model for concrete.” Internal Report, Inst. of Constr. Mat., University of Stuttgart, Germany.
5.
Ožbolt, J., Li, Y.-J., and Eligehausen, R. ( 1998). “3D finite element analysis of over-reinforced beams.” Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Mihashi and Rokugo, eds., Vol. 2, 1233–1240.
6.
“Round robin analysis: Modeling of over-reinforced concrete beams.” (1997). RILEM TC-148SSC.
7.
Ulfkjaer, J. P. ( 1998). “Experimental investigation of over-reinforced concrete beams of three different types of concrete and at two different size scales.” Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, Mihashi and Rokugo, eds., Vol. 2, 1253–1260.
8.
van Mier, J. G. M. ( 1984). “Strain-softening of concrete under multiaxial loading conditions,” Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: May 3, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2000
Published in print: Feb 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.