Research Toward Use of Unprotected Steel Structures
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 12
Abstract
When exposed to fire, steel loses stiffness and strength; to limit this loss of strength and stiffness, external fire protection is provided to the steel structural members to satisfy required fire resistance ratings. However, the current practice of providing fire protection is based on the behavior of single elements under idealistic situations; as such, it is conservative and does not represent the realistic fire behavior of real structures. Recently, there has been a spurt of worldwide research activities aimed at minimizing such fire protection costs. These studies have mainly focused on understanding the realistic fire behavior of complete structures and on developing innovative systems with inherent fire resistance. Feasible solutions are now emerging, in which the external fire protection may be completely removed, in certain situations, without compromising the fire safety of steel structures. This paper reviews some of the recent developments in this field and describes one particular system in some detail. This system uses the conventional composite slab/steel beam flooring system in conjunction with concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Research studies at the United Kingdom's Building Research Establishment and the National Research Council of Canada suggest that it might be possible, through proper design, to eliminate fire protection for steel in this system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Armer, A. S. T., and Moore, D. B. ( 1994). “Full-scale testing on complete multi-storey structures.” The Struct. Engr., London, 72(2), 30–31.
2.
ASTM. ( 1990). “Standard methods of fire tests of building construction and materials.” E 119-88, West Conshohocken, Pa.
3.
Bailey, C. G., Burgess, I. W., and Plank, R. J. ( 1996). “Computer simulation of a full-scale structural fire test.” The Struct. Engr., London, 74(6), 93–100.
4.
Bailey, C. G., and Newman, G. M. ( 1998). “The design of steel framed buildings without applied fire protection.” The Struct. Engr., London, 76(5), 7–81.
5.
British Standards Institution (BSI). ( 1987). “Fire tests on building materials and structures. Part 20: Methods for determination of the fire resistance of elements of construction (general principles).” BS 476, London.
6.
Canadian Standards Association. ( 1989). “Limit states design of steel structures.” CAN/CSA S16.1 M89, Toronto, Ont.
7.
Cooke, G. M. B., and Latham, D. J. ( 1987). “The inherent fire resistance of loaded steel framework.” Steel Constr. Today, Ascot, U.K., 1, 49–58.
8.
Fire protection for structural steel in buildings, 2nd Ed. (1992). The Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, U.K.
9.
Proc., 2nd Cardington Conf., Building Research Establishment, U.K.
10.
International Standards Organization (ISO). ( 1975). “Fire resistance tests—Elements of building construction.” International Standard 834, Geneva.
11.
Kemp, K. O. ( 1967). “Yield of a square reinforced concrete slab on simple supports, allowing for membrane forces.” The Struct. Engr., London, 45(7), 235–240.
12.
Kodur, V. K. R. ( 1999). “Performance-based fire resistance design of concrete-filled hollow steel columns.” J. Constructional Steel Res., in press.
13.
Kodur, V. K. R., and Lie, T. T. ( 1995). “Fire performance of concrete-filled hollow steel columns.” J. Fire. Protection Engrg., 7(3), 89–98.
14.
Kodur, V. K. R., and Lie, T. T. ( 1996). “Evaluation of the fire resistance of rectangular steel columns filled with fibre-reinforced concrete.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 24(3), 339–349.
15.
Kodur, V. K. R., and MacKinnon, D. H. ( 1998). “Simplified design of concrete-filled hollow structural steel columns for fire endurance.” 2nd World Conf. on Steel Constr., 1–15.
16.
Lie, T. T., and Kodur, V. K. R. ( 1996). “Fire performance of concrete-filled tubular columns.” Int. Conf. on Tubular Struct., American Welding Society, Miami, 86–96.
17.
Rubert, A., and Schaumann, P. ( 1986). “Structural steel and plane frame assemblies under fire action.” Fire Safety J., 10, 173–184.
18.
Schleich, J. B. ( 1996). “A natural fire safety concept for buildings—1.” Proc., 2nd Cardington Conf., Building Research Establishment, U.K.
19.
Societe des Ingenieurs et Architectes (SIA). ( 1984). “Fire risk evaluation and calculation procedures.” SIA 81, Zurich.
20.
Steel Construction Industry Forum (SCIF). ( 1991). “Investigation of Broadgate phase 8 fire.” The Steel Construction Institute, Ascot, U.K.
21.
Thomas, I. R., et al. ( 1992). “The effect of fire in the building at 140 William Street.” BHP Res.—Melbourne Lab. Rep., BHP, Melbourne.
22.
Underwriters' Laboratories of Canada (ULC). ( 1989). “Standard methods of fire endurance tests of building construction and materials.” CAN4-S101-M89, Scarborough, Ont., Canada.
23.
Wang, Y. C. ( 1996). “Tensile membrane action in slabs and its application to the Cardington laboratory fire tests.” Proc., 2nd Cardington Conf., Building Research Establishment, U.K.
24.
Wang, Y. C. ( 1997). “Tensile membrane action and fire resistance of steel framed buildings.” Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Fire Safety Sci.
25.
Wang, Y. C., and Moore, D. B. ( 1995). “Steel frames in fire: Analysis.” Engrg. Struct., 17(6), 462–472.
26.
Wood, R. H. ( 1961). Plastic and elastic design of slabs and plates, Thames and Hudson, London.
27.
Yung, D., and Benichou, N. ( 1999). NFPRF 4th Annu. Fire Risk & Hazard Assessment Res. Application Symp.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 12 • December 2000
Pages: 1442 - 1450
History
Received: Aug 2, 1999
Published online: Dec 1, 2000
Published in print: Dec 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.