Parametric Tests on Unreinforced Steel Moment Connections
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
Fully restrained steel moment connections have been designed following a codified design procedure. This design was invalidated by brittle connection fractures discovered after the 1994 Northridge earthquake. A new, widely accepted earthquake-resistant design has not been developed to date. This paper presents a summary of the test results on a post-Northridge steel moment connection design proposed by the SAC Joint Venture. The SAC post-Northridge connection design is a conventional unreinforced welded flange/bolted web connection made using notch-tough weld metal and improved welding practices. This connection achieves a mean plastic rotation of 1.5% radian, averaged over a wide range of connection parameters. The results of these tests show that weld fracture mitigation measures are beneficial, but are not sufficient to produce a connection design that satisfies the plastic rotation requirements for steel moment-resisting frames in regions of high seismicity. A new, earthquake-resistant connection design should be based on a combination of weld fracture mitigation measures and changes of connection configuration aimed at reducing the stress levels or redirecting the stress flow in the connection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, J., Richard, R. M., and Partridge, J. (1998). “Seismic connection designs for new and existing steel moment frame structures.” Proc., 2nd World Conf. on Steel in Constr., Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, England.
2.
Allen, J., Richard, R. M., and Partridge, J. (1999). “Seismic connection designs for retrofitting steel moment frames.” Proc., 8th Can. Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, 525–530.
3.
Beedle, L. S., Lu, L.-W., and Ozer, E. (1973). “Recent developments in steel building design.” AISC Engrg. J., 10(4), 98–111.
4.
Carpenter, L. D., and Lu, L.-W. (1973). “Reversed and repeated load tests of full-scale steel frames.” Tech. Rep. Steel Res. for Constr. Bull. No. 24, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C.
5.
Chen, W.-F., and Patel, K. V. (1981). “Static behavior of beam-to-column moment connections.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(9), 1815–1838.
6.
Chi, W.-M., Deierlein, G. G., and Ingraffea, A. R. (1997). “Finite element fracture mechanics investigation of welded beam-column connections.” Tech. Rep. SAC/BD-97/05, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
7.
El-Tawil, S., Mikesell, T. D., Vidarsson, E., and Kunnath, S. K. (1998). “Strength and ductility of fr welded-bolted connections.” Tech. Rep. SAC/BD-98/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
8.
Engelhardt, M. D., and Husain, A. S. (1993). “Cyclic-loading performance of welded flange-bolted web connections.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 119(12), 3537–3550.
9.
FEMA/SAC. (1995). “Interim guidelines: Evaluation, repair, modification and design of welded steel moment frame structures.” Rep. No. SAC-95-02, FEMA/SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
10.
FEMA/SAC. (1997). “Interim guidelines advisory No. 1.” Rep. No. SAC-96-03, FEMA/SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
11.
Frank, K. H. (1998). “Analysis of tensile data for structural shapes.” Proc., Summary Rep. of 3rd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Steel Fracture Issues, NSF/BRI/Kozai Club, Tokyo, 115–122.
12.
Goel, S. C., Stojadinović, B., and Lee, K.-H. (1996). “A new look at steel moment connections.” Tech. Rep. UMCEE 96-19, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
13.
Goel, S. C., Stojadinović, B., and Lee, K.-H. (1997). “Truss analogy for steel moment connections.” AISC Engrg. J., 34(2), 43–53.
14.
Iwankiw, N. (1997). “Ultimate strength considerations for seismic design of the reduced beam section (internal plastic hinge).” AISC Engrg. J., 34(1), 3–16.
15.
Krawinkler, H., Bertero, V. V., and Popov, E. P. (1975). “Shear behavior of steel frame joints.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 101(11), 2317–2336.
16.
Krawinkler, H., and Popov, E. P. (1982). “Seismic behavior of moment connections and joints.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108(2), 373–391.
17.
Lee, K.-H., Goel, S. C., and Stojadinović, B. (1997). “Boundary effects in welded steel moment connections.” Tech. Rep. UMCEE 97-20, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
18.
Lee, K.-H., Goel, S. C., and Stojadinović, B. (1999). “Saint Venant's principle in steel moment connections.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, submitted for publication.
19.
Manual of steel construction: Load and resistance factor design. (1986). 1st Ed., AISC, Chicago.
20.
Manual of Steel Construction: Load & Resistance Factor Design: Volume 1 and 2. (1995). 2nd Ed., AISC, Chicago.
21.
Parfitt, J., and Chen, W.-F. (1976). “Tests of welded steel beam-to-column moment connections.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(1), 189–202.
22.
Plumier, A. (1997). “The dogbone: Back to the future.” AISC Engrg. J., 34(2), 61–67.
23.
Popov, E. P., Balan, T. A., and Yang, T.-S. (1998). “Post-Northridge earthquake seismic steel moment connections.” Earthquake Spectra, 14(4), 659–677.
24.
Popov, E. P., and Bertero, V. V. (1973). “Cyclic loading of steel beams and connections.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 99(6), 1189–1204.
25.
Popov, E. P., and Pinkney, R. B. (1969). “Cyclic yield reversal in steel building connections.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 95(3), 327–353.
26.
Popov, E. P., and Stephen, R. M. (1970). “Cyclic loading of full-size steel connections.” Tech. Rep. UCB/EERC-70/3, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
27.
Popov, E. P., and Stephen, R. M. (1972). “Cyclic loading of full-size steel connections.” Tech. Rep. Steel Res. for Constr. Bull. No. 21, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C.
28.
SAC. (1996). “Experimental investigations of beam-column subassemblages.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-96/01, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
29.
SAC. (1997). “Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens.” Rep. No. SAC/BD-97/02, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, Calif.
30.
Schneider, S. P., and Roeder, C. W. (1992). “Behavior of weak column strong beam steel frames.” Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. 5, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2937– 2942.
31.
Schneider, S. P., Roeder, C. W., and Carpenter, J. E. (1991). “Seismic performance of weak-column strong-beam steel moment resisting frames.” Tech. Rep., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Washington, Seattle.
32.
Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. (1997). 1st Ed., AISC, Chicago.
33.
Tsai, K. C., and Popov, E. P. (1988). “Steel beam-column joints in seismic moment resisting frames.” Tech. Rep. UCB/EERC-88/19, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
34.
Uniform building code. ( 1985). International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 1 • January 2000
Pages: 40 - 49
History
Received: Apr 5, 1999
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.