Repair Optimization of Highway Bridges Using System Reliability Approach
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 7
Abstract
As reliability based methods gain increased acceptance, there is greater opportunity to use scarce resources more efficiently while maintaining a prescribed level of reliability of a structure throughout its service life. The goal is to provide management decisions that will balance lifetime system reliability and expected life-cycle cost in an optimal manner. This study proposes a system reliability approach for optimizing the lifetime repair strategy for highway bridges. The approach is demonstrated using an existing Colorado State highway bridge. The bridge is modeled as a series-parallel combination of failure modes, and the reliability of the overall bridge system is computed using time-dependent deterioration models and live load models. Based on an established repair criterion, available repair options, repair costs, and updating, the optimum lifetime repair strategy is developed. The sensitivity of the optimum strategy to changes in various problem parameters including the prescribed service life, system failure criterion, and net discount rate is studied. Finally, the conclusions reveal that the proposed approach demonstrates real potential for practical applications, needs frequent updates through inspection, and requires considerable research effort to develop accurate input data.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chang, S. E., and Shinozuka, M. (1996). “Life-cycle cost analysis with natural hazard risk.”J. Infrastruct. Sys., ASCE, 1(3), 118–126.
2.
Clear, K. C. (1992). “Measuring rate of corrosion of steel in field concrete structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1211, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
3.
Clemena, G. G., Jackson, D. R., and Crawford, G. C. (1992). “Inclusion of rebar corrosion rate measurements in condition surveys of concrete bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1347, Maintenance of Highway Structures, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
4.
Colorado Department of Transportation. (1994). “Maintenance management system FY 93/94 year-end report.” Denver.
5.
Colorado Department of Transportation. (1995). “1994 Cost Data.” Cost Estimates Unit, Staff Design Branch, Denver.
6.
Estes, A. C. ( 1997). “A system reliability approach to the lifetime optimization of inspection and repair of highway bridges,” PhD thesis, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
7.
Estes, A. C., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998). “RELSYS: A computer program for structural system reliability analysis.” Struct. Engrg. and Mech., 6(8), 901–919.
8.
Frangopol, D. M., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Lifetime bridge maintenance strategies based on system reliability.” Struct. Engrg. Int., 7(3), 193–198.
9.
Frangopol, D. M., Ghosn, M., Hearn, G., and Nowak, A. S. (1998). “Guest editorial: Structural reliability in bridge engineering.”J. Bridge Engrg., ASCE, 3(4), 151–154.
10.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(10), 286–297.
11.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. ( 1984). “Bridge load modeling and reliability analysis.” Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
12.
Lu, R., Luo, Y., and Conte, J. (1994). “Reliability evaluation of reinforced concrete beams.” Struct. Safety, 14, 277–298.
13.
Nawy, E. G. (1990). Reinforced concrete, a fundamental approach. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
14.
Nowak, A. S. (1993). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.” Final Rep., NCHRP 12-33, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
15.
Nowak, A. S. (1995). “Calibration of LRFD bridge code.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(8), 1245–1251.
16.
Nowak, A. S., and Yamani, A. S. (1995). “A reliability analysis for girder bridges.” Struct. Engrg. Rev., Oxford, England, 7(13), 251–256.
17.
Nowak, A. S., Yamani, A. S., and Tabsh, S. W. (1994). “Probabilistic models for resistance of concrete bridge girders.” ACI Struct. J., 91(3), 269–276.
18.
PONTIS; Release 3.0 User's Manual. (1995). Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Renn, D. P. ( 1995). “Segment-based inspection for load rating within bridge management systems,” MS thesis, Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
20.
Tabsh, S. W., and Nowak, A. S. (1991). “Reliability of highway girder bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(8), 2372–2388.
21.
cThoft-Christensen, P., Jensen, F. M., Middleton, C. R., and Blackmore, A. ( 1997). “Assessment of the reliability of concrete slab bridges.” Reliability and optimization of structural systems, D. M. Frangopol, R. B. Corotis, and R. Rackwitz, eds., Pergamon, Oxford, England, 321–328.
22.
Zokaie, T., Imbsen, R., and Osterkamp, T. (1991). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1290, Vol. 1, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 7 • July 1999
Pages: 766 - 775
History
Received: May 28, 1998
Published online: Jul 1, 1999
Published in print: Jul 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.