Sensitivity Study for Vibrational Parameters Used in Damage Detection
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 4
Abstract
A number of researchers have proposed using vibrational behavior to monitor structures. When significant damage occurs, there are changes in the structural stiffness. This causes changes in the vibrational information. The basic vibrational information normally collected in field monitoring are the natural frequencies and mode shapes. These can be further processed to modal flexibilities. This paper presents a sensitivity study comparing use of natural frequencies, mode shapes, and modal flexibilities for monitoring. The results demonstrate that modal flexibilities are more likely to indicate damage than either natural frequencies or mode shapes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aktan, A. E., Lee, L., and Dalal, V. ( 1995). “Multireference modal testing for bridge diagnostics.” N. Am. Workshop on Instrumentation and Vibration Anal. of Hwy. Bridges, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
2.
Alampalli, S., Fu, G., and Dillon, E. W. ( 1995). “Measuring bridge vibration for detection of structural damage.” Rep. No. FHWA/RR-95/165, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
3.
Chang, K. C., Shen, Z., and Lee, G. C. ( 1993). “Mode analysis technique for bridge damage detection.” Proc., Congr. on Struct. Engrg. in Natural Hazards Mitigation, Am. Soc. of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 1083–1088.
4.
DeWolf J. T., Conn, P. E., and O'Leary, P. N. ( 1995). “Continuous monitoring of bridge structures.” IABSE Symp., Int. Assoc. for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich.
5.
DeWolf J. T., and Zhao, J. ( 1998). “Dynamic vibration techniques in highway bridge monitoring.” Report to Department of Transportation of Connecticut State, Report No. CEE-98-1, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Conn.
6.
Hoyos, A., and Aktan, A. E. ( 1987). “Regional identification of civil engineered structures based on impact induced transient responses.” Res. Rep. No. 87-1, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La.
7.
Kim, J., and Stubbs, N. (1995). “Model-uncertainty impact and damage-detection accuracy in plate girder.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(10), 1409–1417.
8.
Lauzon, R. G. ( 1997). “Vibrational monitoring of a full-scale highway bridge undergoing a destructive test,” PhD thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Conn.
9.
Lauzon, R. G., and DeWolf, J. T. ( 1996). “Nondestructive evaluation with vibrational analysis.” Nondestructive testing methods for civil infrastructure, ASCE, Reston, Va.
10.
Lauzon, R. G. ( 1995). “Full-scale bridge testing to monitor vibrational signatures: Phase II major structure investigation.” Interim Rep., Rep. No. 1408-2-95-5, Connecticut Department of Transportation, Rocky Hill, Conn.
11.
Lauzon, R. G., and DeWolf, J. T. ( 1993). “Full-scale bridge test to monitor vibrational signatures.” Proc., Congr. on Struct. Engrg. in Natural Hazards Mitigation, Am. Soc. of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.
12.
Law, S. S., Ward, H. S., Shi, G. B., Chen, R. Z., Waldron, P., and Taylor, C. (1995). “Dynamic assessment of bridge load-carrying capacities.”J. Struct. Engrg., 121(3), 478–487.
13.
Raghavendrachar, M., and Aktan, A. E. (1992). “Flexibility of multireference impact testing for bridge diagnostics.”J. Struct. Engrg., 118(8), 2186–2203.
14.
Toksoy, T., and Aktan, A. E. ( 1995). “Bridge-condition assessment by modal flexibility.” N. Am. Workshop on Instrumentation and Vibration Anal. of Hwy. Bridges, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jun 14, 1998
Published online: Apr 1, 1999
Published in print: Apr 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.