Reliability-Based Partial Safety Factors in Cantilever Construction of Concrete Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3
Abstract
One of the most important aspects of the construction of concrete bridges using the balanced cantilever method is the limit state of the loss of stability by overturning. This problem is especially relevant because of the lack of guidance in most structural codes about the actions involved and the safety factors to be used. First, the main assumptions, actions, and the methodology involved in the construction of such bridges are presented. The result of the reliability-based calibration process is the definition of a set of partial safety factors to apply in the design of the elements used for ensuring stability during the construction of bridges using this method. The bridges covered in this study are those with main spans between 80 and 140 m. This range includes most of the concrete bridges constructed with the cantilever method. The derived partial safety factors are also valid for a wide range of estimated live loads and wind forces on the deck during consruction. Finally, an example is presented comparing the design values of the stabilizing elements for a bridge with a main span of 120 m, obtained using the proposed safety factors and those computed with a global safety factor of 1.5.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. (1994). Am. Assn. of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
2.
Aparicio, A. C., Casas, J. R., and Ramos, G. (1993). “Expert system for the design of prestressed concrete bridges.”Proc., Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Engrg. & Des. (ICCAE), China Civ. Engrg. Society, Beijing, China, 38–45.
3.
Aparicio, A. C., Casas, J. R., and Ramos, G.(1996). “Computer aided design of prestressed concrete highway bridges.”Comp. and Struct., 60(6), 957–969.
4.
Casas, J. R.(1993). “Probability-based stability design in cantilever bridge construction.”Struct. Engrg. Int., Zürich, Switzerland, 3(4), 233–239.
5.
Casas, J. R., and Sobrino, J. A. (1995). “Geometrical and material uncertainties in reinforced and prestressed concrete bridges.”Proc., XIII ASCE Struct. Congr., Masoud Sanayei, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1462–1465.
6.
CEB-FIP model code 1990. (1991). Bulletin d'Information No. 203. Comitè Euro-International du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland.
7.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. (1994). “Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures.”Final Rep., NCHRP Proj. 12-36, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
8.
Mathivat, J. (1979). Construction par encorbellement des ponts en béton précontraint. Editions Eyrolles, Paris, France (in French).
9.
Melchers, R. E. (1987). Structural reliability, analysis and prediction. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, U.K.
10.
Nowak, A. S.(1995). “Calibration of LRFD bridge code.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 121(8), 1245–1251.
11.
Nowak, A. S., and Grouni, H. N. (1982). “Safety criteria in construction of segmental bridges.”Concrete Int., (Oct.), 80–86.
12.
Ontario highway bridge design code '91. (1991). Ministry of Transp., Downsview, Ont., Canada.
13.
Podolny, W., and Muller, J. M. (1982). Construction and design of prestressed concrete segmental bridges. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1997
Published in print: Mar 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.