Amplitude and Turbulence Effects on Bridge Flutter Derivatives
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 2
Abstract
The paper refers to established theory for the flutter of long-span bridges. Within that theory it is shown that the assumption of a spanwise diminution of coherence in the flutter derivatives can account for the observed phenomenon that turbulence in the cross wind raises the critical speed of instability. This finding is supported by data from two recent model studies of the aerodynamic stability of the Golden Gate Bridge. In this illustrative case the flutter instability condition is uniquely dependent upon a single torsional mode, the aerodynamic damping of which is influenced in a pronounced manner as changes in spanwise coherence effects are postulated. Overall, an observed increase of flutter velocity by 10 to 20% over that under smooth flow is theoretically accounted for.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Davenport, A. G.(1962). “The buffeting of a suspension bridge by storm winds.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 88(33), 233–268.
2.
Ehsan, F., and Scanlan, R. H.(1990). “Vortex-induced vibrations of flexible bridges.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 116(6), 1392–1411.
3.
Irwin, P. A., Xie, J., and Dunn, G. (1995). “Wind tunnel studies for the Golden Gate Bridge.”Final Rep. 93-144F-4 (June) prepared for T. Y. Lin International, Rowan, Williams, Davies and Irwin, Guelph, Ont., Canada.
4.
Larose, G. L. (1992). “The response of a suspension bridge deck to turbulent wind,” MS thesis, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
5.
Raggett, J. D. (1995). “Section model wind tunnel studies, Golden Gate Bridge.”Rep. W920421 (June), West Wind Lab., Carmel, Calif.
6.
Scanlan, R. H.(1993). “Problematics in formulation of wind-force models for bridge decks.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 119(7), 1363–1375.
7.
Scanlan, R. H., and Jones, N. P.(1990). “Aeroelastic analysis of cable-stayed bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 279–297.
8.
Scanlan, R. H., Jones, N. P., and Lorendeaux, O. (1995). “Comparison of taut-strip and section-model-based approaches in long-span bridge aerodynamics.”Proc., Wind Engrg., 9th Int. Conf. Papers, Vol. II, Wiley Eastern, New Delhi, India, 950–961.
9.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H. (1996). Wind Effects on Structures, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
10.
Theodorsen, T. (1935). “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter.”NACA Rep. 496, U.S. Nat. Advisory Com. for Aeronautics, Langley, Va.
11.
Toebes, G. H. (1967). “Fluidelastic features of flow around cylinders.”Proc., Int. Res. Seminar on Wind Effects on Build. and Struct., Vol. 2, Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 323–334.
12.
Wilkinson, R. H.(1981). “Fluctuating pressures on an oscillating square prism, `II.”' Aeronautical Quarterly, London, England, 32(2), 111–125.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 2 • February 1997
Pages: 232 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1997
Published in print: Feb 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.