Diaphragm Effectiveness in Prestressed-Concrete Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 9
Abstract
Each year many prestressed-concrete (P/C) girder bridges are damaged by overheight vehicles or vehicles transporting overheight loads. The effects of this type of loading on P/C bridge behavior was investigated for various types and locations of intermediate diaphragms. The research included a comprehensive literature review; a survey of design agencies; the testing of a full-scale, simple-span, P/C girder-bridge model with eight intermediate diaphragm configurations, as well as a model without diaphragms; and the finite-element analyses of the bridge model assuming both pinned- and fixed-end conditions. The vertical load distribution was determined to be essentially independent of the type and location of the intermediate diaphragms, while the horizontal load distribution was a function of the intermediate diaphragm type and location. Construction details at the girder supports produced significant rotational-end restraint for both vertical and horizontal loading. Both the vertical and horizontal load distributions were found to be affected by the girder-end restraint. A fabricated intermediate structural steel diaphragm was determined to provide essentially the same type of response to lateral and vertical loads that was provided by the reinforced-concrete intermediate diaphragms presently used by the Iowa Department of Transportation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO LFRD bridge design specifications. (1994). 1st Ed., Am. Assoc. of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
2.
Abendroth, R. E., Klaiber, F. W., and Shafer, M. W. (1991). “Lateral load resistance of diaphragms in prestressed concrete girder bridges.”Final Rep., Iowa DOT Proj . HR-319, ISU-ERI-Ames-92076, Engrg. Res. Inst., Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa.
3.
“Building code and commentary requirements for reinforced concrete.” (1989). ACI 318-89, American Concrete Institute (ACI), Detroit, Mich.
4.
Cheung, M. S., Jategaonkar, R., and Jaeger, L. G.(1986). “Effects of intermediate diaphragms in distributing live loads in beam-and-slab bridges.”Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, Canada, 13(8), 278–292.
5.
De Salvo, G. J., and Swanson, J. A. (1985). ANSYS engineering analysis system user's manual, Vol. I and II, Swanson Analysis System, Inc., Houston, Pa.
6.
Interim specifications—bridge. (1991). Am. Association of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
7.
Sengupta, S., and Breen, J. E. (1973). “The effect of diaphragms in prestressed concrete girder and slab bridges.”Res. Rep. 158-1F, Proj. 3-5-71-158, Ctr. for Hwy. Res., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
8.
Shanafelt, G. O., and Horn, W. B. (1980). “Damage evaluation and repair methods for prestressed concrete bridge members.”NCHRP Rep. 226, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
9.
Sithichaikasem, S., and Gamble, W. L. (1972). “Effects of diaphragms in bridges with prestressed concrete I-section girders.”Civ. Engrg. Studies No. 383, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
10.
Standard specifications for highway bridges. (1989). 14th Ed., Am. Association of State Hwy. and Transp. Officials, Washington, D.C.
11.
Wong, A. Y. C., and Gamble, W. L. (1973). “Effects of diaphragms in continuous slab and girder highway bridges.”Civ. Engrg. Studies, Struct. Res. Ser. No. 391, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1995
Published in print: Sep 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.