Effects of Linearizing on Rocking-Block Toppling
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 7
Abstract
We report on the free and harmonically forced vibration responses of a rigid block rotating on a rigid surface. For free vibration, we compare the approximate quarter period for an initially open block with the exact quarter period, which we derive to be an elliptic integral of the first kind. The difference between the two periods increases as a block becomes less slender; however, the approximate solution improves as a function of an increasing initial rotation. The maximum error is 2.0% for a single segment of rotation for practical geometries. For harmonic excitation, we compare ensembles of time histories for linear and nonlinear responses. The poorly conditioned nature of the system emerges prominently when very small amplitude ( <10 −4 ) rocking is predicted and when the forcing amplitude to slenderness angle ratio is between 1.2 and 1.8. Parameter studies delineating between surviving and toppling reveal that models are least sensitive to slenderness angle and peak amplitude, more sensitive to rebound velocity coefficient, and most sensitive to block diagonal. This sensitivity is generally reduced when using the nonlinear model. We conclude the nonlinear model provides more robust results, even for slender blocks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Allen, R. H., Oppenheim, I. J., Parker, A. R., and Bielak, J. (1986). “On the dynamic response of rigid body assemblies.”Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dynamics, Vol. 14, 861–876.
2.
Dimentberg, M. F., Lin, Y. K., and Zhang, R.(1993). “Toppling of computer-type equipment under base excitation.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 119(1), 145–160.
3.
Gradshteyn, I. S, and Ryzhik, I. S. (1980). Table of integrals, series, and products, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
4.
Hancock, H. (1917). Elliptical integrals . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
5.
Hogan, S. J. (1989). “On the dynamics of rigid-block motion under harmonic forcing.”Proc., Royal Soc., London, England, Vol. A425, 441–476.
6.
Housner, G. W.(1963). “The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes.”Bull. Seismic Soc. Am., 53(2), 403–417.
7.
Ishiyama, Y. (1980). “Review and discussion of overturning of bodies by earthquake motions.”BRI Res. Paper, 85, Ministry of Construct., Tsukuba, Japan.
8.
Iyengar, R. N., and Manohar, C. S.(1991). “Rocking response of rectangular rigid blocks under random noise base excitations.”Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 26(6), 885–892.
9.
Lipscombe, P. R., and Pellegrino, S.(1993). “Free rocking of prismatic blocks.”J. of Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 119(7), 1387–1410.
10.
Spanos, P.-T. D., and Koh, A. S.(1984). “Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic excitation.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110(11), 1627–1642.
11.
Tso, W. K., and Wong, C. M. (1989). “Steady state response of rigid blocks part 1: analysis.”Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dynamics, Vol. 18, 89–106.
12.
Wong, C. M., and Tso, W. K. (1989). “Steady state response of rigid blocks part II: experiment.”Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dynamics, Vol. 18, 107–120.
13.
Yim, C. S., Chopra, A. K., and Penzien, J. (1980). “Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes.”Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dynamics, Vol. 8, 565–587.
14.
Yim, C. S., and Lin, H.(1991). “Chaotic behavior and stability of free-standing offshore equipment.”Ocean Engrg., 18(3), 225–250.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1995
Published in print: Jul 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.