Risk-Based Proof-Load Requirements for Bridge Evaluation
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 3
Abstract
Proof-load testing is considered a reliable approach to evaluation of an existing structure's load-carrying capacity. It can be effectively used for highway bridge evaluation, to either enhance an existing rating obtained by an analytical method or establish a rating for bridges unsuitable for analytical rating. Proof-load factors in design and evaluation codes vary, and their basis has not been well documented. For highway bridge evaluation in the United States this paper proposes proof-load requirements in the format of load and resistance factors, to determine target proof loads and resulting load ratings. They are derived to reach target structural reliability levels consistent with current practice by analytical methods, and to ensure relatively uniform safety of bridges. These requirements may be included in specifications for highway bridge evaluation by proof-load testing in the United States, and their application requires little knowledge of structural reliability theory.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO. (1989). Guide specifications for strength evaluation of existing steel and concrete bridges, Washington, D.C.
2.
AASHTO. (1983). Manual for maintenance inspection of bridges, Washington, D.C.
3.
AASHTO. (1989). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
4.
“ACI 318-89.” (1989). Building code requirements for reinforced concrete, ACI, Detroit, Mich.
5.
“ACI 473R-67.” (1982). Strength evaluation of existing concrete buildings, ACI, Detroit, Mich.
6.
Ang, A. H-S., and Tang, W. L. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design; Vols. I and II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
7.
ASCE Committee on Safety of Bridges. (1980). A Guide for the Field Testing of Bridges. ASCE, New York, N.Y.
8.
Bakht, B., and Csagoly, P. F. (1979). “Bridge testing.”Struct. Res. Rep. SRR-79-10, Research and Development Division, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, Ontario, Canada.
9.
British Standards Institution. (1978). BS 5400: part 8: steel, concrete and composite bridges: part 8: recommendations for materials for and workmanship, concrete, reinforcement and prestressing tendons. London, England.
10.
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. (1980). “Development of a probability based load criterion for ANSI A58.”NBS 577, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.
11.
El Shahawy, M., and Garcia, A. M. (1990). “Structural research and testing in Florida.”Transp. Res. Record 1275, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 76–80.
12.
Fu, G., and Moses, F. (1991). “Overload permit checking based on structural reliability.”Transp. Res. Record 1290, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C., 279–289.
13.
Fu, G., Saridis, P., and Tang, J. (1991). “Proof load testing for highway bridges.”FHWA/NY/RR-92/153, Interim Rep. on R209 to FHWA, Engineering R & D Bureau, New York State Department of Transportation, Albany, N.Y.
14.
Fu, G. (1995). “Highway bridge rating by nondestructive proof-load testing for consistent safety.”Final Rep. on R209 to FHWA, Engineering R & D Bureau, New York State Dept. of Transp., Albany, N.Y.
15.
Fujino, Y., and Lind, N. C.(1977). “Proof-load factors and reliability.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 103(4), 853–870.
16.
Grigoriu, M., and Hall, W. B.(1984). “Probabilistic models for proof load testing.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 260–274.
17.
Hansell, W. C., and Viest, I. M.(1971). “Load factor design for steel highway bridges.”AISC Engrg. J., 8(4), 113–123.
18.
Imbsen, R. A., Liu, W. D., Schamber, R. A., and Nutt, R. V. (1987). “Strength of existing reinforced concrete bridges.”NCHRP Rep. 292, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
19.
Institution of Structural Engineers. (1964). Rep. on the testing of struct., London, England.
20.
Institution of Structural Engineers. (1980). Appraisal of existing structures, London, England.
21.
James. R. W., Noel, J. S., Furr, L. H., and Bonilla, F. E. (1985). “Proposed new truck weight formula.”Rep. to FHWA, FHWA, Washington, D.C.
22.
Javor, T.(1976). “Testing bridges in situ.”Mat. and Struct., 9(53), 369–374.
23.
Ladner, M. (1985). “In situ load testing of concrete bridges in Switzerland.”ACI Symp. Strength Evaluation of Existing Concrete Bridges, SP-88, ACI, Detroit, Mich., 59–79.
24.
Moses, F., and Verma, D. (1989). “Load capacity evaluation of existing bridges: phase II.”Draft Final Report on NCHRP 12-28(1), Cleveland, Ohio.
25.
Moses, F., and Verma, D. (1987). “Load capacity evaluation of existing bridges.”Rep. 301, NCHRP 12-28(1), Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
26.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M. (1985). “A comprehensive study of bridge loads and reliability.”Rep. FHWA/OH-85/005, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, Ohio.
27.
Nowak, A. S., and Zhou, J. (1985). Reliability models for bridge analysis. Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
28.
Nutt, R. V., Schamber, R. A., and Zokaie, T. (1988). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.”Final Rep. for NCHRP Project 12-26, Imbsen & Associates, Inc., Sacramento, Calif.
29.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications. (1983). Ontario highway bridge design code. Downsview, Ontario, Canada.
30.
Phillips, M. H., and Wood, J. H. (1987). “Proof loading of highway bridges.”Proc., New Zealand Roading Symp., National Roads Board, Wellington, New Zealand, Vol. 4, 803–807.
31.
Rackwitz, R., and Schrupp, K. (1985). “Quality control, proof testing and structural reliability.”Struct. Safety, Vol. 2, 239–244.
32.
Raths, Raths & Johnson, Inc. (1990). “Nondestructive load testing for bridge evaluation and rating.”Final Rep. of NCHRP 12-28(13), Willowbrook, Ill.
33.
Shinozuka, M., and Yang, J.-N. (1969). “Optimum structural design based on reliability and proof-load test. Annals of Assurance Sci.; Proc., Reliability and Maintainability Conf., Vol. 8, 375–391.
34.
Standards Association of Australia. (1988). Australian Standard: concrete structures, AS 3600-1988, Melbourne, Australia.
35.
Standards Association of Australia. (1990). Australian Standard: steel structures, AS 4100-1990, Melbourne, Australia.
36.
Standards Association of New Zealand. (1982). Code of practice for the design of concrete structures, NZS 3101, Part 1, Wellington, New Zealand.
37.
Standards Association of New Zealand. (1976). Code of practice for general structural design and design loadings for buildings, NZS 4203, Wellington, New Zealand.
38.
Thompson, D. M. (1981). “Loading tests on highway bridges: a review.”TRRL Lab. Rep. 1032, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, England.
39.
Veneziano, D., Meli, R., and Rodriguez, M.(1978). “Proof loading for target reliability.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 104(1), 79–93.
40.
Veneziano, D., Galeota, D., and Giammatteo, M. M. (1984). “Analysis of bridge proof-load data. I: model and statistical procedures.”Struct. Safety, Vol. 2, 91–104.
41.
Veneziano, D., Galeota, D., and Giammatteo, M. M. (1985). “Analysis of bridge proof-load data. II: numerical results.”Struct. Safety, Vol. 2, 177–198.
42.
Yang, J.-N.(1976). “Reliability analysis of structures under periodic proof tests in service.”AIAA J., 14(9), 1225–1234.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 121 • Issue 3 • March 1995
Pages: 542 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1995
Published in print: Mar 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.