Computer‐Automated Design of Semirigid Steel Frameworks
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper presents an efficient computer‐automated method for the optimum design of steel frameworks accounting for the behavior of semirigid connections. The method explicitly accounts for both connections and members by taking connection stiffnesses and member sizes as continuous‐valued and discretevalued variables to the design process, respectively. A continuous‐discrete optimization algorithm is applied to minimize the ‘cost’ of the connections and members for the structure subject to constraints on stresses and displacements under specified design loads. Two steel framework examples are presented to illustrate the features of the design method. It is shown that the design optimization determines connection stiffnesses that are entirely consistent with those for the actual (bolted/ welded) connections employed in conventional steel frameworks, but that member sizes are somewhat different from those found when the connections are (artificially) assumed to be fully rigid. That is, the results suggest that the proposed semirigid design method realistically accounts for connection behavior and produces more appropriate member sizes than does the traditional fully rigid design method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cunningham, R. (1990). “Some aspects of semi‐rigid connections in structural steelwork.” Struct. Engrg., 68(5), 85–92.
2.
Fleury, C., and Sander, G. (1978). “Structural optimization by finite element.” LTAS report SA‐58, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
3.
Frye, M. J., and Morris, G. A. (1975). “Analysis of flexible connected steel frames.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 2(3), 280–291.
4.
Gerstle, K. H. (1988). “Effects of connections on frames.” Steel beam‐to‐column building connections, W. F. Chen, ed., Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., New York, N.Y., 241–267.
5.
Grierson, D. E., and Lee, W.‐H. (1984). “Optimal synthesis of steel frameworks using standard sections.” J. Struct. Mech., 12(3), 335–370.
6.
Lui, E. M., and Chen, W. F. (1986). “Analysis and behavior of flexibly‐jointed frames.” Engrg. Struct., 8, 107–118.
7.
Manual of steel construction. (1978). 8th Ed., Am. Inst. of Steel Const., Inc., Chicago, Ill.
8.
Manual of steel construction‐load and resistance factor design. (1986). 1st Ed., Am. Inst. of Steel Const., Inc., Chicago, Ill.
9.
Monforton, G. R., and Wu, T. S. (1963). “Matrix analysis of semi‐rigidly connected steel frames.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 89(6), 13–42.
10.
A project analysis approach to building costs. (1983). Can. Inst. of Steel Const. and Can. Steel Const. Council, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
11.
Schmit, L. A., and Fleury, C. (1979). “An improved analysis/synthesis capability based on dual methods‐ACCESS 3.” Structures vol., 20th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
12.
Xu, L. (1993). “Optimal design of steel frameworks with semi‐rigid connections.” PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 30, 1992
Published online: Jun 1, 1993
Published in print: Jun 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.