Optimum Design of Three‐Dimensional Framework Structures
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 3
Abstract
A method for optimal design of large‐scale framework structures is presented. The approach is based on a reanalysis technique in combination with suboptimization for each member group in the structure. The suboptimization is performed using a nonlinear programming algorithm based on sequential quadratic programming. Given the topology and material quality, the cross‐sectional dimensions of wide‐flange and hollow‐section members are treated as design variables and the minimum weight or cost solution is sought. The structural problem is formulated using the matrix displacement method. Large three‐dimensional rigidly jointed frames subjected to multiple loading cases are analyzed. Constraints can be imposed on maximum Von Mises stresses, beam stability, and the fatigue damage at nodal points. The approach is general, robust, and efficient in that it avoids numerous global structural analyses. The practical engineering utility of the method is emphasized. Case studies of an offshore deck module and a platform jacket structure are included. Future work should focus on a refined formulation of the fatigue constraint.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Farkas, J. (1989). “Minimum cost design of tubular trusses considering buckling and fatigue constraints.” Tubular structures, E. Niemi, ed., Elsevier Appl. Sci., New York, N.Y., 451–495.
2.
Fatigue Handbook. A. Almar‐Naess (ed.) (1985). Tapir, Trondheim, Norway, 405–422.
3.
Gibstein, M. (1989). “Refined fatigue analysis approach and its application to the Veslefrikk jacket.” Tubular structures, E. Niemi, ed., Elsevier Appl. Sci., New York, N.Y., 321–332.
4.
Khan, M. R. (1984). “Optimality criterion technique applied to frames having general cross‐sectional relationships.” AIAA J., 22(5), 669–676.
5.
Kirsch, U. (1982). “Optimal design based on approximation scaling.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(4), 888–909.
6.
Lassen, T. (1989). ODA‐theoretical manual. Agder Coll. of Engrg., Grimstad, Norway.
7.
Levy, R., and Lev, O. E. (1987). “Recent development in structural optimization.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(9), 1939–1962.
8.
Lotsberg, I., Taarnes, A., and Simensen, P. A. (1988). “Design of Karin deepwater platform with respect to fatigue.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(60), 1211–1229.
9.
Norwegian building codes, steel structures NS3472. (1984). Norwegian Standardization Society, Oslo, Norway.
10.
Schittkowski, K. (1981a). “The nonlinear programming method of Wilson, Han, and Powell with an augmented Lagrangian type line search function. Part 1: Convergence analysis.” Numer. Math., 38(4), 83–114.
11.
Schittkowski, K. (1981b). “The nonlinear programming method of Wilson, Han, and Powell with an augmented Lagrangian type line search function. Part 2: An efficient implementation with linear least square subproblems.” Numer. Math., 38(4), 115–127.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 3 • March 1993
Pages: 713 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 5, 1991
Published online: Mar 1, 1993
Published in print: Mar 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.