Determination of Critical J‐Integral for Wood
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 7
Abstract
The determination of the critical J‐integral value for wood is considered. The methods are based on the American Society for Testing and Materials standard “ a measure of fracture toughness.” A significant revision of the method proposed in the J‐integral standard is needed. Three possibilities for analyzing of the results are developed. The graphical method presupposes no knowledge of the material properties and relies on the recorded Jhyphen;integral versus crack growth curve. The compliance method uses the compliance data recorded during each loading and unloading cycle and the maximum load. The measured maximum load can also be inserted in an equation based on the finite element method. Another method based on the standard “plane strain fracture toughness of metallic materials” is used to study the dependence between the critical J‐integral and the experimental and material parameters. The determined critical J‐integral values are independent of the analysis method. The effect of time is observed: The slower J‐integral tests give a lower value than the more rapid fracture toughness tests. The effects of moisture and the fracture system reflect the behavior of the modulus of elasticity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Standard test method for plane‐strain fracture toughness of metallic materials.” (1981). ASTM E399‐81, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.
2.
“Standard test for a measure of fracture toughness.” (1981). ASTM E813‐81, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.
3.
Barrett, J. D., and Foschi, R. O. (1977). “Mode II stress‐intensity factors for cracked wood beams.” Eng. Fract. Mech., 9(2), 371–378.
4.
Debaise, G. R., Porter, A. W., and Pentoney, R. E. (1966). “Morphology and mechanics of wood fracture.” Mater. Res. Standards, 6(10), 493–499.
5.
Fonselius, M., and Riipola, K. (1992). “Determination of fracture toughness for wood.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 118(7), 1727–1740.
6.
Hunt, D. G., and Croager, W. P. (1982). “Mode II fracture toughness of wood measured by a mixed mode test method.” J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1(2), 77–79.
7.
Mall, S., Murphy, J. F., and Schottafer, J. E. (1983). “Criterion for the mixed mode fracture in wood.” J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 109(3), 680–690.
8.
Porter, A. W. (1964). “On the mechanics of fracture in wood.” Forest Prod. J., XIV(8), 325–331.
9.
Riipola, K., and Fonselius, M. (1988). “Evaluation of critical J‐integral for wood material.” Res. Reports 528, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland, (in Swedish).
10.
Schniewind, A. P., and Pozniak, R. A. (1971). “On the fracture toughness of Douglas fir wood.” Engrg. Fract. Mech., 2(3), 223–233.
11.
Wallin, K., Saarelma, H., Saario, T., and Varis, E. (1984). “Automatic fracture toughness testing system at the Technical Research Centre of Finland.” Res. Notes 398, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
12.
Williams, J. G. (1988). “On the calculation of energy release rates for cracked laminates.” Int. J. Fract., 36(3), 101–119.
13.
Williams, J. G., and Birch, M. W. (1976). “Mixed mode fracture in anisotropic media.” Cracks and Fract. ASTM STP 601, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 125–137.
14.
Wu, E. M. (1967). “Application of fracture mechanics to anisotropic plates.” J. Appl. Mech., Trans. ASME, 34(4), 967–974.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1992
Published in print: Jul 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.