Plane Frame Optimum Design Environment Based on Genetic Algorithm
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 11
Abstract
A computational environment suitable for optimum design of structures in the general class of plane frames is described. Design optimization is based on the use of a genetic algorithm in which a population of individual designs is changed generation by generation applying principles of natural selection and survival of the fittest. The fitness of a design is assessed using an objective function in which violations of design constraints are penalized. Facilities are provided for automatic data editing and reanalysis of the structure. The environment is particularly useful when parametric studies are required. The use of the environment is illustrated in a study of a cable‐stayed bridge structure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Awadalla, E. S., Burns, A., and Jenkins, W. M. (1976). “Economical design of trussed beam structures.” CAD '76 Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England.
2.
Campos, I., and Schwefel, H. P. (1989). “KBOPT: A knowledge‐based optimization system.” Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer‐Aided Optimum Design of Struct. C. Brebbia and S. Hernandez, eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, England.
3.
Goldberg, D. E., and Samtani, M. P. (1987). “Engineering optimization via genetic algorithm.” Proc. 9th Conf. on Electronic Computation, ASCE, New York, N.Y.
4.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989a). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Adison Wesley, Boston, Mass.
5.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989b) “Sizing populations for serial and parallel genetic algorithms.” Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, Calif.
6.
Goldberg, D. E., Bradley, K., and Kalyanmoy, D. (1989). “Messy genetic algorithms: Motivation, analysis and first results.” TCGA Report No. 89003, The Clearing House of Genetic Algorithms, Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
7.
Goldberg, D. E., Bradley, K., and Kalyannoy, D. (1990). “An investigation of messy genetic algorithms.” TCGA Report No. 90005, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
8.
Hegab, H. I. A. (1986). “Static analysis of cable‐stayed bridges.” Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England, 87 (Dec.).
9.
Jenkins, W. M. (1990). Structural analysis using computers. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, Essex, England.
10.
Jenkins, W. M. (1991a). “Towards structural optimization via the genetic algorithm.” Computers and Struct., 40(5), 1321–1327.
11.
Jenkins, W. M. (1991b). “Structural optimization with the genetic algorithm.” The Structural Engineer, London, England, 69(24), 418–422.
12.
Michell, A. G. M. (1904). “The limits of economy of material in frame‐structures.” Phil. Mag., 8(47), 589–597.
13.
Stojanovski, P., and Aleksovski, G. (1986). “Computer‐aided minimum weight design of steel trusses.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Steel Struct., Budva, Yugoslavia.
14.
Thevendran, V., and Shanmugam, N. E. (1985). “Minimum weight design of cold‐formed steel sections.” Civil Comp Proc., 85, Civil Comp Press, Edinburgh, Scotland, 369–375.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 11 • November 1992
Pages: 3103 - 3112
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1992
Published in print: Nov 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.