Simulation of Dynamic Load for Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper deals with the analysis of dynamic loads in bridges. Models are developed for trucks, road surface (roughness) and the bridge. The statistical parameters are based on the results of surveys, tests and analysis. Truck parameters include the body (mass), suspensions, and tires. Road profiles are simulated using stochastic processes (power spectral density function). A bridge is treated as a prismatic beam. The Monte Carlo method is used to simulate the traffic on the bridge. Random variables include the truck type, total weight, axle distances, and speed. Calculations are carried out for steel and prestressed concrete girder bridges. The dynamic load factors for a bridge design code are calculated based on the 75 year mean maximum loads. The analysis is performed for single trucks and for two trucks (side by side). Dynamic loads are lower for heavier trucks and also lower for two trucks. The calculated static and dynamic deflections are presented in tables and graphs as a function of gross vehicle weight, span and axle distance. Simulated deflections indicate that the dynamic component is not correlated with the static component. Therefore, the dynamic loads are lower for heavier trucks. It is also found that the dynamic loads for two trucks are lower than for single trucks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Billing, J. R. (1982). “Dynamic tests of bridges in Ontario, 1980.” MTC Res. and Development Reports, Downsview, Ontario, Canada, Vol. 26.
2.
Cantieni, R. (1983). “Dynamic load tests on highway bridges in Switzerland.” Report No. 211, Swiss Federal Laboratories of Materials Testing and Research, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
3.
Fancher, P. S., Ervin, R. D., MacAdam, C. C., and Winkler, C. B. (1980). “Measurement and representation of the mechanical properties of truck leaf springs.” Technical Paper Series 800905, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa.
4.
Fancher, P. S., and Ervin, R. D. (1986). “A component factbook for straight and articulated heavy trucks,” UMTRI‐86‐12, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Mich.
5.
Hwang, E.‐S. (1990). “Dynamic loads for girder bridges,” thesis presented to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
6.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M. (1983). “Instrumentation for weighing trucks‐in‐motion for highway bridge loads.” Final Report, Report No. FHWA/OH‐83/001, Cleveland, Ohio.
7.
Nowak, A. S., Hong, Y.‐K., and Hwang, E.‐S. (1990). “Calculation of load and resistance factors for OHBDC 1990.” Report UMCE 90‐06, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
8.
O'Connor, C., and Pritchard, R. W. (1985). “Impact studies on small composite girder bridge.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(3), 641–653.
9.
Ontario highway bridge design code. (1983). Ministry of Transportation, Downs‐view, Ontario, Canada.
10.
Standard specifications for highway bridge. (1989). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 5 • May 1991
Pages: 1413 - 1434
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: May 1, 1991
Published in print: May 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.