System Reliability and Load‐Sharing Effects in Light‐Frame Wood Construction
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 4
Abstract
The wood industry is developing a load and resistance factor design (LRFD) specification for wood construction. Specification provisions are intended to apply to light‐frame as well as heavy, engineered timber construction. The current national design specification contains a repetitive use factor, which permits allowable stresses in light‐frame construction to be increased by 15% under certain conditions (no less than three members, spaced no more than 24 in. on center, joined by a floor, roof, or other load‐distributing element). This factor accounts for load sharing and partially composite action in a simple way. A factor that serves a similar purpose in LRFD can be determined on the basis of a system reliability analysis of a simple model representing a light‐frame floor system. This analysis accounts for duration‐of‐load (DOL) effects, which are known to be significant in wood construction. The analysis shows that the load sharing and DOL effects are interrelated, and that failure to include the DOL effect in system reliability analysis leads to an overly optimistic appraisal of the system effect.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“American national standard minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” (1982). ANSI‐A58‐1982. American National Standards Institute, New York, N.Y.
2.
Barrett, J. D., and Foschi, R. O. (1978). “Duration of load and failure probability in wood. Part I. Modelling creep rupture.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 5(4), 505–514.
3.
Bulleit, W. (1985). “Relative reliability of dimension lumber in bending.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 111(9), 1948–1963.
4.
Bulleit, W. (1987). “Markov model for wood structural systems.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(9), 2023–2031.
5.
Chalk, P. L., and Corotis, R. B. (1980). “Probability model for design live loads.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 106(10), 2017–2033.
6.
Cramer, S. M., and Wolfe, R. W. (1989). “Load‐distribution model for light‐frame wood roof assemblies.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(10), 2603–2616.
7.
Criswell, M. E. (1979). “Selection of limit states for wood floor design.” Probab. Mech. Struct. Reliab., ASCE, 161–165.
8.
Criswell, M. E. (1981). “New floor design procedures.” Forest Products Research Society Conf. on Wall and Floor Systems: Design and Performance of Light‐Frame Systems, Denver, Colo., Sep.
9.
Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J. G., Galambos, T. V., and Cornell, C. A. (1982). “Probability based load criteria: Load factors and load combinations.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(5), 978–997.
10.
Ellingwood, B. (1981). “Reliability of wood structural elements.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(1), 73–87.
11.
Ellingwood, B. R., Hendrickson, E. M., and Murphy, J. F. (1988). “Load duration and probability based design of wood structural members.” Wood Fib. Sci., 20(2), 250–265.
12.
Ellingwood, B., and Rosowsky, D. (1991). “Duration of load effects in LRFD for wood construction.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(2).
13.
Folz, B., and Foschi, R. O. (1989). “Reliability‐based design of wood structural systems.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(7), 1666–1680.
14.
Foschi, R. O. (1984). “Relability of wood structural systems.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(12), 2995–3014.
15.
Foschi, R. O. (1982). “Structural analysis of wood floor systems.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(7), 1557–1574.
16.
Galambos, T. V. (1982). “Probability based load criteria: Assessment of current design practice.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 108(5), 959–977.
17.
Gerhards, C. C., and Link, C. L. (1986). “Effect of loading rate on bending strength of Douglas‐fir 2 by 4's.” For. Prod. J., 36(2), 63–66.
18.
Green, D. W., and Evans, J. W. (1987). “Mechanical properties of visually graded lumber.” Vols. 1‐5, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Madison, Wis.
19.
Hendrickson, E. M., Ellingwood, B., and Murphy, J. (1987). “Limit state probabilities for wood structural members.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(1), 88–106.
20.
Hsiao, L.‐E., Yu, W.‐W., and Galambos, T. V. (1990). “AISI LRFD method for cold‐formed steel structural members.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(2), 500–517.
21.
“Load and resistance factor design for engineered wood construction—A prestandard report.” (1988). J. F. Murphy, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
22.
Load and resistance factor design specification for steel buildings. (1986). American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Ill.
23.
Madsen, B. (1975). “Strength values for wood and limit states design.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., 2(3), 270–279.
24.
McCutcheon, W. J. (1986). “Stiffness of framing members with partial composite action.” J. Struct. Engrg., 112(7), 1623–1638.
25.
National design specification for wood construction. (1986). National Forest Products Association, Washington, D.C.
26.
Polensek, A. (1976). “Finite element analysis of wood‐stud walls.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(7), 1317–1335.
27.
Thompson, E. G., Vanderbilt, M. D., and Goodman, J. R. (1977). “FEAFLO: A program for the analysis of layered wood systems.” Comput. Struct., 7, 237–248.
28.
Timber construction manual. (1985). Third Ed., American Institute of Timber Construction, Englewood, Colo.
29.
Vanderbilt, M. D., Goodman, J. R., and Criswell, M. E. (1974). “Service and overload behavior of wood joist floor systems.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 100(1), 11–29.
30.
Wood, L. W. (1951). “Relation of strength of wood to duration of loads.” Report No. 1916, U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1991
Published in print: Apr 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.