Nonlinear Dynamics of Coupled Shear Walls Using Transfer Matrices
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 4
Abstract
An application of the transfer‐matrix technique to the nonlinear dynamic analysis of coupled shear walls is presented. Through the proposed method, the problem is reduced to a tractable size without the imposition of severe uniformity conditions on the structure. The dynamic response is determined by a step‐by‐step numerical approach in which the properties of the structural elements are updated according to the current state of deformation and yield. The transfer‐matrix formulation adopts established models of material behavior in dealing with inelastic beam deformation and load reversals. The dynamic solution assumes constant properties within short time increments, and relies on the kinematic relationships of the Wilson‐θ method. Damping has also been taken into account through a simple viscous model. The effectiveness and accuracy of the method, as well as its potential for further development, are assessed by comparing its predictions with measured displacements of model structures subjected to various base motions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Akintilo, I. A., and Syngellakis, S. (1989). “Inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete coupled shear walls by the transfer matrix method.” The Struct. Engr., 67(15), 284–288.
2.
Akintilo, I. A., and Syngellakis, S. (1990). “An investigation of the beam‐wall junction of coupled shear walls by the transfer matrix method.” The Struct. Engr., 68(22), 444–450.
3.
Aristizabal‐Ochoa, J. D., and Sozen, M. A. (1976). “Behavior of ten‐story reinforced concrete walls subjected to earthquake motions.” Struct. Res. Series, Report No. 431, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
4.
Giberson, M. F. (1969). “Two nonlinear beams with definitions of ductility.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 95(2), 137–157.
5.
Keshavarzian, M., and Schnobrich, W. C. (1985). “Inelastic analysis of R/C coupled shear walls.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 13(4), 427–448.
6.
Livesley, R. K. (1964). Matrix methods of structural analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
7.
Lybas, J. M., and Sozen, M. A. (1977). “Effect of beam strength and stiffness on dynamic behavior of R/C coupled walls.” Struct. Res. Series, Report No. 444, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
8.
Mahin, S. A., and Bertero, V. V. (1976). “Nonlinear seismic response of a coupled wall system.” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 102(9), 1759–1780.
9.
Moudarres, F. R., and Coull, A. (1986). “Stiffening of linked shear walls.” J. Engrg. Mechanics, ASCE, 112(3), 223–237.
10.
Saatcioglou, M., Derecho, A. T., and Corley, W. G. (1983). “Modelling hysteretic behavior of coupled walls for dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 11(5), 711–726.
11.
Saatcioglou, M., Derecho, A. T., and Corley, W. G. (1987). “Parametric study of earthquake‐resistant coupled walls.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 113(1), 141–157.
12.
“Structural use of concrete.” (1985). BS 8110—Parts 1 & 2, British Standards Inst., London, England.
13.
Syngellakis, S., and Papoulia, K. D. (1987). “A transfer matrix approach to free vibrations of coupled shear walls.” Engrg. Struct., 9(4), 265–271.
14.
Takayanagi, T., and Schnobrich, W. C. (1979). “Nonlinear analysis of coupled wall systems.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 7(1), 1–22.
15.
Wilson, E. L., Farhoomand, I., and Bathe, K. J. (1973). “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of complex structures.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 1(2), 241–252.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1991
Published in print: Apr 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.