Cost Comparison of Timber, Steel, and Prestressed Concrete Bridges
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 12
Abstract
This study was undertaken to investigate the economics of timber bridge superstructures versus traditional steel/concrete and prestressed concrete alternatives in the short‐span range of 20 to 60 ft (6.1–18.3 m). Only superstructure costs were considered because substructure and abutment costs are highly site‐specific. A lack of definitive data regarding service lives and maintenance costs precluded a life‐cycle cost study; thus, only initial costs were compared. Representative superstructure designs were obtained for timber, steel/concrete, and prestressed concrete bridges at 20‐, 40‐, and 60‐ft spans. Five to six northern New England general contractors performed cost estimates on these designs. Also, nine timber bridge designs, three at each span length, received cost estimates from three timber bridge suppliers. Results from general contractors indicated that timber was cost competitive with steel/concrete and was less expensive than prestressed concrete. Results from timber bridge suppliers showed more impressive distinct initial cost advantages for timber over both steel/concrete and prestressed concrete. The study indicated the initial cost effectiveness of modern, short‐span timber bridges in northern New England.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cundy, E. J. (1989). “Cost comparison of short‐span timber bridges versus steel and concrete alternatives,” thesis presented to the University of New Hampshire, at Durham, N.H., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
2.
Dunker, K. F., Klaiber, F. W., and Sanders, W. W. (1987). “Bridge strengthening needs in the United States.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1118, 1–8.
3.
“The development of economical low‐volume road bridges.” (1987). Report No. FHWA/DF‐87/002, Nat. Tech. Information Service, Springfield, Va., 26–27.
4.
Hamilton, L. C. (1990). An introduction to modern data analysis. Brooks/Cole Publishers, Pacific Grove, Calif.
5.
Hill, J. J., and Shirole, A. M. (1984). “Economic and performance considerations for short‐span bridge replacement structures.” Transp. Res. Rec, 950, 33–38.
6.
Means heavy construction cost data—1989. (1989). R. S. Means Co., Kingston, Mass.
7.
“Precast prestressed concrete short span bridges.” (1980). Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, Ill.
8.
Tukey, J. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison‐Wesley, Reading, Mass.
9.
Verna, J. R., et al. (1984). “Timber bridges: Benefits and costs.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(7), 1563–1571.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1990
Published in print: Dec 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.