Method for Simulating Tension Performance of Lumber Members
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 10
Abstract
A methodology is described for simulating the tension performance of lumber members. The described methodology uses detailed knowledge of individual board three‐dimensional fiber orientation in a finite element model to predict the fracture behavior that occurs in lumber. Grain‐angle data maps were obtained using previously developed nondestructive measurement techniques and small clear‐wood specimen property tests were conducted to provide model input. In addition to fracture patterns, the methodology accurately predicts the tensile strength of lumber specimens without the aid of empirical adjustment factors. The computational characteristics of the fracture‐related aspects of the model are described. Sample experimental observations are provided, showing the accuracy of the method for predicting fracture patterns, load‐displacement response, and tensile strength of lumber specimens. It is hoped that this methodology will lead to a new fundamental basis for grading lumber and determining allowable design stresses. Discussion is provided on those material characteristics, including within‐board grain‐angle and property variations that make lumber performance difficult to predict.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anthony, R., and Bodig, J. (1988). “Tension behavior of knot‐containing Douglasfir boards.” Proc. 1988 Int. Conf. on Timber Engineering, 2, Forest Products Research Society, 779–786.
2.
Badreddine, L. (1988). “Supporting studies and tests for modeling lumber in tension.” M.S. Independent Study Report, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, Wis.
3.
Bechtel, F. K., and Allen, J. R. (1987). “Methods of implementing grain angle measurements in the machine stress rating process.” Proc., Sixth Symp. on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash., 303–353.
4.
Bodig, J., and Goodman, J. R. (1973). “Prediction of elastic parameters for wood.” Wood Sci., 5(4), 249–264.
5.
Bodig, J., and Jayne, B. A. (1982). Mechanics of wood and wood composites, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, N.Y.
6.
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., and Plesha, M. E. (1989). Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
7.
Cramer, S. M., and Goodman, J. R. (1983). “Model for stress analysis and strength prediction of lumber.” Wood Fiber Sci., 18(4), 338–349.
8.
Cramer, S. M., and Goodman, J. R. (1986). “Failure modeling: A basis for the strength prediction of lumber.” Wood Fiber Sci., 18(3), 446–459.
9.
Cramer, S. M., and McDonald, K. (1989). “Predicting lumber stiffness and strength with local grain angle measurements and failure analysis.” Wood Fiber Sci., 21(4), 393–410.
10.
Cramer, S. M., et al. (1988). “Exploring the relationship between local grain angle and initial fracture in lumber subject to tensile load.” Proc. 1988 Int. Conf. on Timber Engineering, 2, Forest Products Research Society, 566–575.
11.
Dabholkar, A. (1980). “Analysis of wood with knots and cross grain,” thesis presented to the Dept. of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
12.
Elias, E. G. (1982). “True bending strength ratio of dimension lumber,” thesis presented to the Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
13.
Freese, C. E., and Tracey, D. M. (1976). “The natural isoparametric triangle versus collapsed quadrilateral for elastic crack analysis.” Int. J. Fracture, 12(5), 767–770.
14.
Ghandi, K. R. (1972). “Analysis of an inclined crack centrally placed in an orthotropic rectangular plate,” J. Strain Anal., 7(3), 157–162.
15.
Juedes, B. M. (1986). “Failure modeling of wood tensile members.” M.S. Independent Study Report, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, Wis.
16.
Liu, J. Y. (1984). “Evaluation of the tensor polynomial strength theory for wood.” J. Compos. Mater., 18(3), 216–226.
17.
Mall, S., Murphy, J. F., and Shottafer, J. E. (1983). “Criterion for mixed mode fracture in wood.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 109(3), 680–690.
18.
Matthews, P. C., and Soest, J. F. (1986). Method for determining localized fiber angle in a three‐dimensional fibrous material, U.S. Patent 4,606,345.
19.
McDonald, K. A., and Bendtsen, B. A. (1986). “Measuring localized slope of grain by electrical capacitance.” For. Prod. J., 23(5), 75–78.
20.
Pearson, R. G. (1974). “Application of fracture mechanics to the study of the tensile strength of structural lumber.” Holzforschung, 28, 11–19.
21.
Petterson, R. W., and Bodig, J. (1983). “Prediction of the fracture toughness of conifers.” Wood Fiber Sci., 15(4), 302–316.
22.
Phillips, G. E., Bodig, J., and Goodman, J. R. (1981). “Flow‐grain analogy.” Wood Fiber Sci., 14(2), 55–64.
23.
Pugel, A. (1980). “Evaluation of selected mechanical properties of coniferous knot‐wood,” thesis presented to the Dept. of Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University, at Fort Collins, Colo., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
24.
Schmidt, M. K. (1987). “Modeling considerations for predicting the tensile behavior of lumber.” M.S. Independent Study Report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, Wis.
25.
Shih, C. F., deLorenzi, H. G., and German, M. D. (1976). “Crack extension modeling with singular quadratic isoparametric elements.” Int. J. Fracture, 12(4), 647–651.
26.
Sih, G. C., and Liebowitz, H. (1968). “Mathematical theories of brittle fracture.” Fracture, an advanced treatise, 2, Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 108–130.
27.
Stahl, D. C. (1988). “The effect of ‘dive’ on the tensile behavior of defect containing lumber: Modifications to the U.W. grain angle strength prediction program,” thesis presented to the Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, at Madison, Wis., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
28.
“Standard methods for establishing structural grades and allowable properties for structural lumber.” (1989a). D245‐88, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 99–115.
29.
“Standard methods of testing small clear specimens of timber.” (1989b). D143‐83, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 55–64.
30.
Wu, E. M. (1967). “Application of fracture mechanics to orthotropic plates.” J. Appl. Mech., 34(4), 967–974.
31.
Zandbergs, J. G., and Smith, F. W. (1988). “Finite element fracture predictions for wood with knots and crossgrain.” Wood Fiber Sci., 20(1), 97–106.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 10 • October 1990
Pages: 2729 - 2745
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1990
Published in print: Oct 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.