Strength and Stiffness Reduction of Large Notched Beams
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 112, Issue 9
Abstract
Four large glulam beams with notches on the tension side were tested for strength and stiffness. Using either bending net section beam theory or shear formula to calculate crack propagation critical load is very unconservative. A linear elastic fracture mechanics approach, taking into account the high tension stresses perpendicular to grain and shear stresses at the notch reentrant corner, conservatively predicts the critical load. The data corroborate the substantial analytic effect of size predicted by fracture mechanics for notched beams. Results quantify the observed behavior of bending of beams with notches on the tension side. The strength reduction is so severe for large beams that substituting a beam having the net depth of the notched beam is preferable. Removing material would remove the stress concentrator and would increase the strength up to net section theory prediction at the notch location. Using an effective notch length (actual notch length + notch depth added to each end of the notch) and variable moment of inertia, beam theory accurately predicts the notch beam deflection under load.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bohannan, B., “Effect of Size on Bending Strength of Wood Members,” USDA Forest Serv. Res. Pap. FPL 56, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wis., 1966.
2.
Hahn, H. T. “A Mixed Mode Fracture Criterion for Composite Materials,” Composites Technology Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1983, pp. 26–29.
3.
Hirai, T., and Sawada, M., “Stiffness and Load Carrying Capacity of Square‐Notched Wood Beams 3: On the Maximum Failure Moments,” Research Bulletins of the College Experiment Forests, College of Agriculture, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan, 1980, 37(3), pp. 759–788.
4.
Hoyle, R. J., Jr., “Wood Technology in the Design of Structures,” College of Engineering, Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash., 1972.
5.
Mall, S., Murphy, J. F., and Schottafer, J. E., “Criterion for the Mixed Mode Fracture in Wood,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 3, 1983, pp. 680–690.
6.
Murphy, J. F., “Using Fracture Mechanics to Predict Failure of Notch Wood Beams,” Proc. First International Conf. on Wood Fractures, held at Banff, Alberta, 1978, Forintek Canada Corp., Vancouver, B.C., 1979, pp. 159–173.
7.
“National Design Specification for Wood Construction,” National Forest Products Association, Washington, D.C., 1982.
8.
Petterson, R. W., and Bodig, J., “Prediction of Fracture Toughness of Conifers,” Wood and Fiber Science, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1983, pp. 302–316.
9.
“Standard Methods for Establishing Stresses for Structural Glued Laminated Timber (glulam),” ASTM D 3737‐83a, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1983.
10.
“Standard Methods for Establishing Clear Wood Strength Values,” ASTM D 2555–81, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa., 1981.
11.
“Timber Construction Manual,” Second Edition, American Institute of Timber Construction, Englewood, Colo., 1974.
12.
“Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Agriculture Handbook No. 72, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1974.
13.
Wu, E. M., “Application of Fracture Mechanics to Anisotropic Plates,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 1967, pp. 967–974.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 112 • Issue 9 • September 1986
Pages: 1989 - 2000
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1986
Published in print: Sep 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.