Reliability Calibration of Bridge Design Code
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 112, Issue 4
Abstract
The current AASHTO design loads were developed more than 40 yrs ago based on truck traffic in operation in that period. The code, however, has produced safe designs despite the vastly increased legal loads and reduced levels of maintenance. New structural analysis procedures and continuous pressure to increase the legal load limits justify a code review to maintain the current safety levels for all design applications. This is accomplished by using a reliability analysis with data from large scale field measurements on actual truck loadings and bridge responses. The data obtained from these measurements is projected to calculate the maximum expected live load in the lifetime of the structure and used to calculate a safety index. Safety indices for typical spans are first calculated for designs that satisfy the current AASHTO code. A target safety index is extracted from these values and a new design procedure is proposed to achieve this target index uniformly for all the spans considered. A parametric analysis shows that the proposed changes are insensitive to small variations in the data base if the average current safety level is acceptable and can be used as basis for future code changes.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO, Manual for Maintenance Inspections of Highway Bridges, Washington, DC, 1983.
2.
AASHTO, Standard Specifications of Highway Bridges, Washington, DC, 1983.
3.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY, 1970.
4.
Csagoly, P. F., and Dorton, R. A., “Proposed Ontario Bridge Design Load,” RR 186, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, ON, Canada, Nov., 1973.
5.
Ellingwood, B., Galambos, T. W., MacGregor, J. C., and Cornell, C. A., “Development of a Probability Based Load Criteria for ANSI A58,” National Bureau of Standards, NBS 577, June, 1980.
6.
Galambos, T. V., et al., “Eight Collected Papers on Load and Resistance Factor Design,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. ST9, Sept., 1978.
7.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F., “A Markov Renewal Model for Maximum Bridge Loading,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 111, No. 9, Sept., 1985.
8.
Hansell, W. C., and Viest, I. M., “Load Factor Design for Steel Highway Bridges,” Engineering Journal, AISC, Oct., 1971.
9.
Hasofer, A. M., and Lind, N. C., “An Exact and Invariant Second‐Moment Code Format,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. EM1, Feb., 1974.
10.
Moses, F., “Weigh‐in‐Motion System Using Instrumented Bridges,” Journal of the Transportation Division, ASCE, Apr., 1979.
11.
Moses, F., and Garson, R. C., “Probability Theory of Highway Bridge Fatigue Stresses,” Final Report to Ohio Department of Transportation, July, 1973.
12.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M., “A Comprehensive Study of Bridge Loads and Reliability,” Final Report to ODOT, Civil Engineering Department, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH, Jan., 1985.
13.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M., “Instrumentation for Weighing Trucks‐In‐Motion for Highway Bridge Loads,” Final Report, FHWA/OH‐83/001, Aug., 1983.
14.
Moses, F., and Ghosn, M., “Weighing Trucks‐In‐Motion Using Instrumented Highway Bridges,” Final Report, FHWA/OH‐81/008, Dec., 1981.
15.
Moses, F., and Kriss, M., “Weigh‐in‐Motion Instrumentation,” Civil Engineering Department, Report FHWA‐RD‐78‐81, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH, 1978.
16.
Moses, F., and Pavia, A., “Probability Theory for Highway Bridge Fatigue Stresses—Phase II,” Final Report, Ohio Department of Transportation, Aug., 1976.
17.
Nowak, A. S., and Grouni, H. N., “Safety Criteria in Calibration of the OHBD Code,” Proceedings, International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Toronto, Canada, Aug., 1982.
18.
Nyman, W. E., and Moses, F., “Calibration of Fatigue Design Model,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, to be published.
19.
Snyder, R. D., Likins, G. E., and Moses, F., “Loading Spectrum Experienced by Bridge Structures in the United States,” Report to FHWA, Sept., 1982.
20.
Thoft‐Christensen, P., and Baker, M. J., Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications, Springer‐Verlag, New York, NY, 1982.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 112 • Issue 4 • April 1986
Pages: 745 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1986
Published in print: Apr 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.