Effect of Design Seismic Loads on a Highway Bridge
Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 11
Abstract
The measured and calculated response of a five‐span reinforced concrete highway bridge subjected to static lateral loads is presented. The experimental studies included nondestructive static tests of the bridge loaded by hydraulic jacks at the intersection of piers and the deck, as well as quick‐release dynamic tests. The lateral deflection of the bridge deck was measured at the abutments and at the intersection of piers and the deck. The bridge was loaded to approximately 50% above the seismic design loads. No sign of distress was observed even though these very large loads were used. The analytical studies included several static elastic and inelastic analyses of the bridge for the test loads, the loads used in the design of the bridge, and the loads based on the current Applied Technology Council (ATC) guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges. An inelastic model was developed that accounted for the nonlinear action at the pier to foundation connections. In this model, the loads are applied monotonically in small load increments and the internal forces and deformations are determined for each increment. Comparison of the experimental and analytical results showed that, by ignoring the foundation flexibility (an assumption made in design of the bridge), the lateral displacement at the deck center was underestimated by approximately 50%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Concrete Institute Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318‐83),” Detroit, Mich., 1983.
2.
Douglas, B. M., and Reid, W. H., “Dynamic Tests and System Identification of Bridges,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Structural Division, Vol. 108, No. ST10, Oct., 1982, pp. 2295–2312.
3.
Douglas, B. M., and Norris, G. M., “Nondestructive Dynamic Tests of Selected Highway Bridges in Nevada and Related Geotechnical Considerations,” Engineering Report No. 58, University of Nevada, Reno, Nev., to be published.
4.
Douglas, B. M., Saiidi, M., Richardson, J., and Hart, J., “Results from High‐Amplitude Dynamic Tests and Implications for Seismic Design,” Proceedings of the Fifteenth Joint Meeting of U.S./Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, UJNR, May, 1983.
5.
Gates, J. H., and Smith, M. J., “Verification of Dynamic Modeling Methods by Prototype Excitation,” California Department of Transportation, Report No, FHWA/CA/SD‐82/07, Sacramento, Calif., Nov., 1982.
6.
Imbsen, R. A., Nutt, R. V., and Penzien, J., “Evaluation of Analytical Procedures Used in Bridge Seismic Design Practice,” Proceedings of a Workshop on Earthquake Resistance of Highway Bridges, Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, Calif., Nov., 1979.
7.
Imbsen, R. A., and Schamber, R. A., “Energy Absorption and Stiffness Characteristics of Bridge Bearing Pads on Sliding Friction Surfaces Subjected to Dynamic Loadings with Varying Load Rates and Amplitudes,” Interim Report to FHWA, Engineering Corporation, Sacramento, Calif., May, 1981.
8.
Prakash, S., Soil Dynamics, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 1981.
9.
“Seismic Design Guidelines for Highway Bridges,” ATC‐6, Applied Technology Council, Berkeley, Calif., Oct., 1981.
10.
American Association of State Highway Officials, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 9th Ed., 1965.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1984
Published in print: Nov 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.