TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2008

Selection of Superior Tillage and Fertilizer Practices Based on Rainfall and Soil Moisture Effects on Pearl Millet Yield under Semiarid Inceptisols

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 3

Abstract

Based on seven field experiments of pearl millet with nine treatment combinations of tillage and fertilizer nutrients conducted during 2000–2006 in a semiarid inceptisol at Agra, an assessment is made in this paper about sustainability of treatments using rainfall received during the crop growing period and available soil moisture at sowing, 20, 40, and 60days after sowing (DAS) and harvest. Three practices, each of tillage: conventional tillage+mechanical weed control, low tillage+mechanical weed control, and low tillage+mechanical weed control+herbicide ; and fertilizer application of 60kgN [farmyardmanure(FYM)]+40kgPha , 30kgN (FYM)+30kgN (urea)+40kgPha and 60kgN (urea)+40kgPha were tested in the same site over seven years. The F-test indicated significant soil moisture differences on different DAS and also between different tillage treatments. Significant yield differences were found among treatments of tillage and fertilizer and their interaction in all seasons, except 2001 and 2002. Treatment-wise correlation of yield with monthly rainfall received in June–September and available soil moisture on different DAS indicated that September rainfall had a negative and significant correlation with yield attained by tillage and fertilizer treatments. The soil moisture at 20 DAS had a negative and significant correlation with yield under all treatments except conventional tillage+mechanical weed control. The soil moisture at 60 DAS and harvest had a positive and significant correlation with yield attained under different tillage and fertilizer treatments. Regression models of yield were calibrated for tillage and fertilizer treatments through monthly rainfall during July–September and soil moisture on different DAS. The predictability of yield improved significantly by inclusion of both rainfall and soil moisture variables in the models compared to either of the two groups of variables. Ranks were assigned to tillage and fertilizer treatments for yield attained in individual years and mean yield, prediction error, and sustainable yield index over years. The study indicated that conventional tillage+mechanical weed control among tillage together with 30kgN (FYM)+30kgN (urea)+40kgPha was superior with a minimum rank sum compared to other treatments. The treatment gave a maximum sustainable yield of 1,683kgha with a net return of Rs 5,670ha , benefit–cost ratio of 1.16, and sustainable yield index of 47.2% under semiarid inceptisols of Agra.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis, Wiley, New York.
Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. (1985). Statistical procedures for agricultural research, Wiley, New York.
Kempthorne, O. (1952). Design and analysis of experiments, Wiley, New York.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (1986). “On screening of regression models for selection of optimal variable subsets.” J. Ind. Soc. Agric. Stat., 38(2), 161–168.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (1992). “Application of statistical model-building and optimization techniques in fertilizer use research.” Dryland agriculture: State of art of research in India, Chap. 28, L. L. Somani, ed., Vedams, New Delhi, 653—671.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Vittal, K. P. R., Ravindra Chary, G., Ramakrishna, Y. S., and Girija, A. (2006). “Sustainability of tillage practices for rainfed crops under different soil and climatic situations in India.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 21(1), 60–73.
Prihar, S. S., and Gajri, P. R. (1988). “Fertilization of dryland crops.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 3(1), 1–33.
Sharma, R. A., Thakur, H. S., Holkar, S., Chouhan, S. S., and Devkant, K. (2003). “Impact of tillage, land treatments, and organic residue management on soil health, drainage, and crop productivity of rained cotton.” Research bulletin No. AICRPDA-NATP-RCPS-11/2003, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochron, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
Venkateswarlu, J., and Singh, R. (1982). “Crop response to applied nutrients under limited water conditions.” Review of soils research in India, Proc., 12th Int. Soil Science Congress, New Delhi.
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., Balaguravaiah, D., Padamalatha, Y., and Yellamanda Reddy, T. (2003). “Modeling sustainability of crop yield on rainfed groundnut based on rainfall and land degradation.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 18(1), 7–13.
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., and Samra, J. S. (2002). “Sustainability of practices of dryland agriculture—Methodology and assessment.” Research bulletin, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.
Vittal, K. P. R., Ravindra Chary, G., and Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (2004). “Improved agronomic practices for different rainfed crops.” AICRPDA bulletin, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 134Issue 3June 2008
Pages: 361 - 371

History

Received: Mar 17, 2007
Accepted: Sep 21, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anupam K. Nema
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Raja Balwant Singh College, Agra-283105, India.
G. R. Maruthi Sankar [email protected]
Principal Scientist, Dept. of Agricultural Statistics, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad-500059, India. E-mail: [email protected]
S. P. Chauhan
Professor, Dept. of Agronomy, Raja Balwant Singh College, Agra-283105, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share