Selection of Superior Tillage and Fertilizer Practices Based on Rainfall and Soil Moisture Effects on Pearl Millet Yield under Semiarid Inceptisols
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 3
Abstract
Based on seven field experiments of pearl millet with nine treatment combinations of tillage and fertilizer nutrients conducted during 2000–2006 in a semiarid inceptisol at Agra, an assessment is made in this paper about sustainability of treatments using rainfall received during the crop growing period and available soil moisture at sowing, 20, 40, and after sowing (DAS) and harvest. Three practices, each of tillage: conventional weed control, low weed control, and low weed ; and fertilizer application of , and were tested in the same site over seven years. The F-test indicated significant soil moisture differences on different DAS and also between different tillage treatments. Significant yield differences were found among treatments of tillage and fertilizer and their interaction in all seasons, except 2001 and 2002. Treatment-wise correlation of yield with monthly rainfall received in June–September and available soil moisture on different DAS indicated that September rainfall had a negative and significant correlation with yield attained by tillage and fertilizer treatments. The soil moisture at 20 DAS had a negative and significant correlation with yield under all treatments except conventional weed control. The soil moisture at 60 DAS and harvest had a positive and significant correlation with yield attained under different tillage and fertilizer treatments. Regression models of yield were calibrated for tillage and fertilizer treatments through monthly rainfall during July–September and soil moisture on different DAS. The predictability of yield improved significantly by inclusion of both rainfall and soil moisture variables in the models compared to either of the two groups of variables. Ranks were assigned to tillage and fertilizer treatments for yield attained in individual years and mean yield, prediction error, and sustainable yield index over years. The study indicated that conventional weed control among tillage together with was superior with a minimum rank sum compared to other treatments. The treatment gave a maximum sustainable yield of with a net return of Rs , benefit–cost ratio of 1.16, and sustainable yield index of 47.2% under semiarid inceptisols of Agra.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis, Wiley, New York.
Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. (1985). Statistical procedures for agricultural research, Wiley, New York.
Kempthorne, O. (1952). Design and analysis of experiments, Wiley, New York.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (1986). “On screening of regression models for selection of optimal variable subsets.” J. Ind. Soc. Agric. Stat., 38(2), 161–168.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (1992). “Application of statistical model-building and optimization techniques in fertilizer use research.” Dryland agriculture: State of art of research in India, Chap. 28, L. L. Somani, ed., Vedams, New Delhi, 653—671.
Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Vittal, K. P. R., Ravindra Chary, G., Ramakrishna, Y. S., and Girija, A. (2006). “Sustainability of tillage practices for rainfed crops under different soil and climatic situations in India.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 21(1), 60–73.
Prihar, S. S., and Gajri, P. R. (1988). “Fertilization of dryland crops.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 3(1), 1–33.
Sharma, R. A., Thakur, H. S., Holkar, S., Chouhan, S. S., and Devkant, K. (2003). “Impact of tillage, land treatments, and organic residue management on soil health, drainage, and crop productivity of rained cotton.” Research bulletin No. AICRPDA-NATP-RCPS-11/2003, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Snedecor, G. W., and Cochron, W. G. (1967). Statistical methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
Venkateswarlu, J., and Singh, R. (1982). “Crop response to applied nutrients under limited water conditions.” Review of soils research in India, Proc., 12th Int. Soil Science Congress, New Delhi.
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., Balaguravaiah, D., Padamalatha, Y., and Yellamanda Reddy, T. (2003). “Modeling sustainability of crop yield on rainfed groundnut based on rainfall and land degradation.” Ind. J. Dryland Agric. Res. Dev., 18(1), 7–13.
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., and Samra, J. S. (2002). “Sustainability of practices of dryland agriculture—Methodology and assessment.” Research bulletin, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.
Vittal, K. P. R., Ravindra Chary, G., and Maruthi Sankar, G. R. (2004). “Improved agronomic practices for different rainfed crops.” AICRPDA bulletin, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 17, 2007
Accepted: Sep 21, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.