Volume-Based Imperviousness for Storm Water Designs
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 2
Abstract
The concept of low impact development (LID) is to apply decentralized on-site runoff source control to preserve the watershed hydrologic and ecological functions. An integrated layout using bioretention and vegetated landscape can decrease the developed runoff volume and peak flow. One of the key factors in urban hydrology is the imperviousness in the watershed. The conventional approach is to weight the imperviousness by the subareas in the watershed. Obviously, the area-weighted method has become inadequate when coping with LID because LID takes the flow path into consideration. When an impervious area directly drains onto a pervious area, the area-weighted method fails to count for the additional soil infiltration loss. In this study, the conventional area-weighted method is modified with a paved area reduction factor that converts the area-weighted imperviousness to its effective imperviousness. A family of curves was also developed for engineering applications. When a cascading process is introduced to the runoff flow path, the paved area reduction factor can be determined using the impervious to pervious area ratio and the infiltration to rainfall intensity ratio.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Chow, V. T. (1964). Handbook of applied hydrology, Chaps. 17 and 21, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Driscoll, E. D., DiToro, O., Gaboury, D., and Shelley, P. (1989). “Methodology for analysis of detention basins for control of urban runoff quality.” EPA440/5-87-001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (1970). “Airport drainage.” AC No. 150/5320-5B, Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Guo, J. C. Y. (1998). “Overland flow on a pervious surface.” IWRA Int. J. Water, 23(2).
Guo, J. C. Y. (1999). “Detention storage volume for small urban catchments.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 125(6), 380–382.
Guo, J. C. Y. (2001). “Rational hydrograph method for small urban watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 6(4), 352–356.
Guo, J. C. Y. (2002). “Overflow risk analysis for storm water quality control basins.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 7(6), 428–434.
Guo, J. C. Y. (2004). “Hydrology-based approach to storm water detention basin design using new routing schemes.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(4), 333–336.
Morgali, J. R., and Linseley, R. K. (1965). “Computer analysis of overland flow.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 3, 81–100.
Rossman, L. A. (2005). Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5 (SWMM5), Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Cincinnati.
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD). (2001). Urban storm water drainage criteria manual, Vol. 3, UDFCD, Denver.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1983). “Results of the nationwide urban runoff program.” NTIS Final Rep. No. PB84-185545, Washington, D.C.
Wooding, R. A. (1965). “A hydraulic model for a catchment-stream problem.” J. Hydrol., 3, 254–267.
Woolhiser, D. A., and Liggett, J. A. (1967). “Unsteady one-dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph.” Water Resour., 3(3), 753–771.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 4, 2007
Accepted: Jun 25, 2007
Published online: Apr 1, 2008
Published in print: Apr 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.