Effect of Controlled Drainage and Vegetative Buffers on Drainage Water Quality from Wastewater Irrigated Fields
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 2
Abstract
Lagoon effluent is routinely applied to agricultural fields as fertilizer to utilize nutrients derived from animal manures. In humid regions, effluent is also applied to fields in order to manage the lagoon stage within acceptable levels. To minimize the risk of applied nutrients being transported to surface waters, best management practices such as vegetative buffers and controlled drainage are often recommended. This paper presents the results of a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of controlled drainage and vegetative buffers in reducing the transport of wastewater nutrients from land application fields. Swine lagoon effluent was spray irrigated to Bermudagrass fields drained by a parallel ditch system. Drainage outflow was monitored continuously for a 3 year period. Vegetative buffers reduced the average concentration of phosphorus by about 30%, but the average concentration of nitrogen was not affected. Controlled drainage resulted in higher individual event nitrogen concentrations, which were due primarily to irrigation onto fields at times when they were too wet to be effectively irrigated. In most cases, the concentration of total N in drainage was comparable to the values observed from other agricultural fields receiving inorganic fertilizer. However, the nitrogen was mainly in the ammonium form rather than nitrate, which could pose greater environmental risk to some fish and other aquatic species in surface waters. The peak concentrations were higher for the controlled drainage treatments than for conventional drainage. The loss of nitrogen in drainage water accounted for roughly 10% of the amount applied (8% on the conventional drainage treatments and 11% on the controlled drainage treatments). On two plots (one controlled, one conventional), more than 40% of the total N transport over the 3 year study period was associated with one extended flow event when wastewater was applied several times while the water table was near the surface. These poorly scheduled irrigations onto already wet fields resulted in as much N and P transport in one event as occurred during the remainder of the study when irrigation was properly scheduled onto dry fields. These observations suggest that irrigation scheduling and proper management were more important to water quality than remedial actions such as controlled drainage or vegetative buffers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Barker, J. C., and Zublena, J. P. (1993). “Livestock manure nutrient assessment in North Carolina.” Publication No. WQWM-79\EBAE 170-93, Soil Science Spatial Research Laboratory, North Carolina Cooperative Extension, Raleigh, N.C.
Burchell, M. R. (2003). “Practices to reduce nitrate-nitrogen losses from drained agricultural lands.” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Carlile, B. L. (1980). “Animal waste management in high water table soils.” Livestock waste: A renewable resource, R. J. Smith, ed., Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on Livestock Wastes, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 156–162.
Cooke, R., Nehmeleman, R. J., and Kalita, P. (2002). “Effect of tile depth on nitrate transport from tile drainage systems.” ASAE Paper No 022017, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
Deal, S. C., Gilliam, J. W., Skaggs, R. W., and Konyha, K. D. (1986). “Prediction of nitrogen and phosphorus losses as related to agricultural drainage system design.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 18, 37–51.
Dillaha, T. A., Reneau, R. B., Mostaghimi, S., and Lee, D. (1989). “Vegetative filter strips for agricultural non-point source pollution control.” Trans. ASAE, 32(2), 513–519.
Dowdy, S., and Wearden, S. (1991). Statistics for research, Wiley, New York, 205–209.
Dukes, M. D., Evans, R. O., Gilliam, J. W., and Kunickis, S. H. (2001). “Effect of riparian buffer width and vegetative type on shallow groundwater quality in the middle coastal plain of North Carolina.” Trans. ASAE, 45(2), 327–336.
Evans, R. O., Skaggs, R. W., and Gilliam, J. W. (1995). “Controlled versus conventional drainage effects on water quality.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 121(4), 271–276.
Freshman, J. D. (1976). “A perspective on land as a waste management alternative.” Proc., 1976 Cornell Agricultural Waste Management Conf. on Land as a Waste Management Alternative, R. E. Loehr, ed., Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich., 3–6.
Gambrell, E. P., Gilliam, J. W., and Weed, S. B. (1974). “The fate of fertilizer nutrients as related to water quality in the North Carolina coastal plains.” Rep. No 93, Water Resources Institute, Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
Gilliam, J. W. (1994). “Riparian wetlands and water quality.” J. Environ. Qual., 23(5), 898–900.
Groffman, P. M., Axelrod, E. A., Lemunyon, J. L., and Sullivan, W. M. (1991). “Denitrification in grass and forest vegetated filter strips.” J. Environ. Qual., 20, 671–674.
Jacobs, T. C., and Gilliam, J. W. (1985). “Riparian losses of nitrate from agricultural drainage waters.” J. Environ. Qual., 14(4), 472–478.
Jaynes, D. B., Kaspar, T. C., Moorman, T. B., and Parkin, T. B. (2002). “Subsurface drain modifications to reduce nitrate losses in drainage.” ASAE Paper No. 022015, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
Jia, Z. (2000). “Evaluating a lagoon effluent land application system and the effect of controlled drainage and vegetative buffer strips on drainage water quality.” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
Jordan, T. E., Correl, D. L., and Weller, D. E. (1993). “Nutrient interception by a riparian forest receiving inputs from adjacent cropland.” J. Environ. Qual., 22(3), 467–473.
Lowrance, R. R. (1992). “Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a Coastal Plain riparian forest.” J. Environ. Qual., 21, 401–405.
Lowrance, R. R., Todd, R. L., and Asmussen, L. (1983). “Waterborne nutrient budgets for the riparian zone of an agricultural watershed.” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ., 10, 371–384.
Lowrance, R. R., et al. (1995). “Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.” Rep. No. EPA 903-R-95-004/CBP/TRS 134/95, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Osmond, D. L., Xu, L., Ranells, N. N., Hodges, S. C., Hansard, R., and Pratt, S. H. (2001). “Nitrogen loss estimation worksheet (NLEW): An agricultural nitrogen loading reduction tracking tool.” Proc., 2nd Int. Nitrogen Conf. on Science and Policy, Vol. Sci. 1, Scientific World, New York.
Peterjohn, W. T., and Correll, D. L. (1984). “Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest.” Ecology, 65(5), 1466–1475.
Skaggs, R. W., Breve, M. A., and Gilliam, J. W. (1994). “Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(1), 1–32.
Skaggs, R. W., and Gilliam, J. W. (1981). “Effect of drainage system design and operation on nitrate transport.” Trans. ASAE, 24(4), 929–934.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1983). “Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes.” Rep. No. EPA-600/4-79-020, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2004
Accepted: Dec 21, 2004
Published online: Apr 1, 2006
Published in print: Apr 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.