Comparison of Models for Computing Drainage Discharge
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 6
Abstract
The WAVE model describes the transport and transformations of matter and energy in the soil, crop, and vadose environment. A lateral field drainage subprogram was added to the WAVE model to simulate lateral subsurface drainage flow. The subsurface drainage is considered as the drainage provided by evenly spaced parallel drains with a free outlet: drain tubing or ditch. The rate of subsurface water movement into drain tubes or ditches depends on the hydraulic conductivity of the soil, drain or ditch spacing, hydraulic head in the drains, profile depth, and water table elevation. Hooghoudt's steady-state equation was selected for incorporation in the WAVE model. The subsurface drainage subprogram was calibrated and validated by comparison with the SWAP model (The Netherlands) and DRAINMOD (the United States) and partially by using 7 years of drain outflow data from an experimental field under fallow and cropped conditions. The comparative study revealed that the three models performed equally well and that the models were reliable and accurate tools for predicting the drainage flux as a function of rainfall-evapotranspiration and local conditions. The WAVE model, in comparison to the SWAP and DRAINMOD model, provided as good a prediction of the lateral subsurface drainage flow to drains. The statistical analysis between each model and observed data revealed that the three models were able to predict with sufficient accuracy the observed drainage discharge. The DRAINMOD model, however, has the advantage of giving a more accurate estimate of the discharge, resulting in a more precise modeling. The models were consistent in predicting water table levels, but they could not be verified against field data because of a lack of suitable measurements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, M. P., and Woessner, W. W. ( 1992). Applied groundwater modelling simulation of flow and advective transport, University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
2.
Bouwer, H., and van Schilfgaarde, J. ( 1963). “Simplified method of predicting the fall of water table in drained land.” Trans. ASCE, 6(4), 288–291, 296.
3.
Ducheyne, S. ( 2000). “Derivation of the parameters of the WAVE model using a deterministic and a stochastic approach.” PhD thesis No. 434, Facu. of Agr. and Appl. Biol. Sci., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
4.
Groen, K. P. ( 1997). “Pesticide leaching in polders, field and model studies on cracked clays and loamy sand.” Rijkswaterstaat, Directie Ijsselmeergebied (RWS, RDIJ), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
5.
Hooghoudt, S. B. ( 1940). “Bijdrage tot de kennis van eenige natuurkundige grootheden van den grond No. 7.” Algemeene beschouwingen van het probleem van de detailontwatering en de infiltratie door middel van parallel loopende drains, greppels, slooten en kanalen, Departement van landbouw en visscherij, directie van de landbouw, Algemeene Staatsdrukkerij, The Hague, The Netherlands, Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen, 46(14), 515–707 (in Dutch).
6.
Legates, D. R., and McCabe, G. J. ( 1999). “Evaluating the use of `goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrological and hydroclimatic model validation.” Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233–241.
7.
Moody, W. T. (1967). “Nonlinear differential equation of drain spacing.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., ASCE, 92(2), 1–9.
8.
Ritzema, H. P. ( 1994). “Subsurface flow to drains.” Drainage principles and applications, ILRI Publ. 16, 2nd Ed., H. P. Ritzema, ed., International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 263–304.
9.
Shahin, M., Van Oorschot, H. J. L., and De Lange, S. J. ( 1993). Statistical analysis in water resources engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
10.
Skaggs, R. W. ( 1980). Methods for design and evaluation of drainage water management systems for soils with high water tables, DRAINMOD, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C.
11.
Vanclooster, M., Viaene, P., Christiaens, K., and Ducheyne, S. ( 1996). WAVE, a mathematical model for simulating water and agrochemicals in the soil and the vadose environment, reference and user's manual, release 2.1, Inst. for Land and Water Mgmt., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
12.
Vanclooster, M., Viaene, P., Diels, J., and Christiaens, K. ( 1994). WAVE, a mathematical model for simulating water and agrochemicals in the soil and the vadose environment, reference and user's manual, release 2.0, Inst. for Land and Water Mgmt., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
13.
Van Dam, J. C., et al. ( 1997). “SWAP version 2.0, Theory and simulation of water flow, solute transport and plant growth in the soil-water-atmosphere-plant environment.” Tech. Document 45, DLO Winand Staring Ctr., Rep. 71, Dept. of Water Resourc., Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
14.
Van der Molen, W. H., and Wesseling, J. ( 1991). “A solution in closed form and a series solution to replace the tables from the thickness of the equivalent layer in Hooghoudt's drain spacing formula.” Agric. Water Mgmt., Amsterdam, 19, 1–16.
15.
Vàzquez, R., Feyen, L., Christiaens, K., Abu El-Nasr, A., and Feyen, J. ( 1999). “Calibration and validation of the distributed physically based hydrological MIKE SHE model, with application to the Gete basin.” Internal Publ. 55, ILWM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 6 • December 2001
Pages: 363 - 369
History
Received: Sep 25, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.