Finite-Element Grid Configurations for Drains
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 4
Abstract
Several different finite-element grid configurations were evaluated for use in the numerical approximation of steady and transient flow to a single drain. By comparing the numerically simulated drain flow rates and head distributions with analytic values, a nested configuration was found to be appropriate for an effective drain radius of 0.01 m, and a square configuration was suitable for an effective drain radius of 0.05 m. Using an analytic solution, a method was developed to determine the distance of influence of a drain as a function of its effective radius and the geometry of its flow domain. The distance of influence was found to be independent of material type. An appropriate between-drain grid spacing was selected for the numerical simulation of multiple drains by increasing the grid mesh spacing outside the distance of influence. The position of the water table and drain flow rate with time were used to evaluate the between-drain grid spacing for transient variably saturated flow. Grid Péclet and Courant numbers, together with the shape of the solute advance front, were used to evaluate the suitability of the selected single drain configuration and between-drain grid spacing for solute transport. The resulting finite-element grid configuration for single and multiple drains ensures a stable efficient numerical solution, and it has applicability to numerical modeling of multiple subsurface drains.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, M. P., and Woessner, W. W. (1992). Applied groundwater modeling, Academic, San Diego.
2.
Barcelo, M. D., and Nieber, J. L. ( 1981). “Simulation of natural soil pipes in a soil profile.” Summer Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
3.
Barcelo, M. D., and Nieber, J. L. ( 1982). “Influence of soil pipe networks on catchment hydrology.” Summer Meeting, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich.
4.
Belitz, K., Phillips, S. P., and Gronberg, J. M. (1992). “Numerical simulation of ground-water flow in the central part of the western San Joaquin Valley, California.” Open-File Rep. 91-535, U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, Calif.
5.
Eching, S. O., Hopmans, J. W., and Wallender, W. W. (1994). “Estimation of in situ unsaturated soil hydraulic functions from scale cumulative drainage data.” Water Resour. Res., 30(8), 2387–2394.
6.
Fipps, G., Skaggs, R. W., and Nieber, J. L. (1986). “Drains as a boundary condition in finite elements.” Water Resour. Res., 22(11), 1613–1621.
7.
Garcia, L. A., Manguerra, H. B., and Gates, T. K. (1995). “Irrigation-drainage design and management model: Development.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 121(1), 71–82.
8.
Gureghian, A. B., and Youngs, E. G. (1975). “The calculation of steady-state water-table heights in drained soils by means of the finite element method.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 27, 15–32.
9.
Huyakorn, P. S., and Pinder, G. F. (1983). Computational methods in subsurface flow, Academic, London.
10.
Kirkham, D. (1949). “Flow of ponded water into drain tubes in soil overlying an impervious layer.” Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 30(3), 369–385.
11.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. ( 1988). “A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model.” Chapter A1, U.S. Geological Survey techniques of water resource investigations, Book 6.
12.
Massey, F. C., Skaggs, R. W., and Sneed, R. E. (1983). “Energy and water requirement for subirrigation vs. sprinkler irrigation.” Trans. ASAE, 26(1), 126–133.
13.
Mualem, Y. (1976). “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522.
14.
Neuman, S. P., and Narasimhan, T. N. (1977). “Mixed explicit-implicit iterative finite element scheme for diffusion-type problems: I. Theory.” Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 11, 309–323.
15.
Nour el-Din, M. M., King, I. P., and Tanji, K. K. (1987a). “Salinity management model: I. Development.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 113(4), 440–453.
16.
Nour el-Din, M. M., King, I. P., and Tanji, K. K. (1987b). “Salinity management model: II. 1 and 2-D applications.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 113(4), 454–468.
17.
Pohll, G. M., and Guitjens, J. C. (1994). “Modeling regional flow and flow to drains.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 120(5), 925–939.
18.
Richards, L. A. (1931). “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums.” Phys., 1, 318–333.
19.
Šimunek J., Vogel, T., and van Genuchten, M. Th. (1994). “The SWMS _2D code for simulating water flow and solute transport in two-dimensional variably saturated media. Version 1.2.” Res. Rep. No. 132, U.S. Salinity Lab., USDA-ARS, Riverside, Calif.
20.
van Genuchten, M. Th., Leij, F. J., and Yates, S. R. (1991). “The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils.” Rep. EPA/600/2-91/065, U.S. Salinity Lab., USDA-ARS, Riverside, Calif.
21.
Vimoke, B. S., Yura, T. D., and Thiel, T. J. (1962). “Improvements in construction and use of resistance networks for studying drainage problems.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 26(2), 203–207.
22.
Vogel, T., and Hopmans, J. W. (1992). “Two-dimensional analysis of furrow infiltration.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE, 118(5), 791–806.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 126 • Issue 4 • July 2000
Pages: 243 - 249
History
Received: Sep 30, 1998
Published online: Jul 1, 2000
Published in print: Jul 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.