Participative Process in Tube Well Irrigation Development
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 6
Abstract
Farmer participation in the development of their irrigation systems promises greater farmer satisfaction with the system. It also relieves government of the administrative and cost burden associated with the operation and maintenance of irrigation systems. There are important differences between surface‐ and ground‐water irrigation systems, which are reflected in their operation and maintenance. These in turn impact on the organization and, more specifically, on the form that participation can take. Ground‐water irrigation systems using electrical or diesel pumps are much more cash‐intensive than surface‐water systems, which require mainly labor input from their members. Tube well systems are highly dependent upon a support system of workshops, mechanics, and electricians, and on the supply of diesel fuel or electricity, all of which require payment in cash. Surface‐water irrigation systems are less dependent on support from urban centers, and may be more self‐reliant. These factors affect the nature of farmer participation in tube well systems and the role of the agency promoting participative development.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bagadion, B. U., and Korten, F. F. (1985). “Developing irrigators organizations: A learning process approach.” Putting people first: Sociological variables in rural development, M. M. Cernea, ed., World Bank, Washington, D.C., 52–90.
2.
Base line survey stage II. (1988). Bhairawa‐Lumbini Groundwater Project, Bhairawa, Nepal.
3.
Bhairawa‐Lumbini groundwater irrigation project; updated feasibility study for stage III. (1988). Tahal Consulting Engineers Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
4.
Bottrall, A. F. (1981). “Comparative study of the management and organization of irrigation projects,” Staff Working Paper No. 458, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
5.
Finsterbusch, K., and Van Wicklin, W. A., III. (1987). “The contribution of beneficiary participation to development project effectiveness.” Public Administration and Development. London, England, 7(1), 1–23.
6.
Freeman, D. M., and Lowdermilk, M. L. (1985). “Middle‐level organizational linkages in irrigation projects.” Putting people first: Sociological variables in rural development, M. M. Cernea, ed., World Bank, Washington, D.C., 91–117.
7.
Irrigation line of credit groundwater sub projects. (1990). Tahal Consulting Engineers Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
8.
Olin, M. (1989). Plan for increased farmer participation in project cycle. Tahal Consulting Engineers Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel.
9.
Participatory experiences in irrigation management; Proc., Expert Consultation on Irrigation Water Management. (1984). Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Yogyakarta and Bali, Indonesia.
10.
Pradhan, U. (1988). Local resource mobilization and government intervention in hill irrigation systems in Nepal. Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
11.
Van Doorne, J. H. (1985). A review of small scale irrigation schemes in Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 6 • November 1992
Pages: 882 - 894
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1992
Published in print: Nov 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.