Estimating Unit Hydrograph Peak Rate Factors
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 109, Issue 2
Abstract
The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) dimensionless unit hydrograph model TR‐20 is widely used for hydrologic design. The model uses a dimensionless unit hydrograph, with the drainage area, the depth of the runoff volume, the time‐to‐peak, and the SCS peak rate factor required to dimensionalize the unit hydrograph. A standard value of 484 for the peak rate factor is commonly used. While vague guidelines have been provided for modifying the value of the parameter, almost all designs are made using a value of 484. A method is presented that provides a systematic means of obtaining a value of the peak rate factor that is unique to a watershed. The method only requires a runoff curve number map, which should be developed to use the TR‐20 model anyway. Application of the method to six watersheds, including three coastal basins, indicates that the method increases the accuracy of prediction; the peak rate factors computed using the procedure outlined compared very favorably with the values obtained by optimizing on measured rainfall hyetographs and runoff hydrographs. The results indicate that the value of 484 is too large for coastal watersheds on the Delmarva peninsula.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bondelid, T. R., and McCuen, R. H., “An Automatic Optimization Version of the SCS TR‐20 Computer Program,” Technical Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Md., 1981.
2.
“Computer Program for Project Formulation‐Hydrology,” Technical Release No. 20, Supplement No. 1, Central Technical Unit Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., 1969.
3.
Dooge, J. C. I., “Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems,” Technical Bulletin No. 1468, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C., Oct., 1973.
4.
Estimating Peak Flow Frequencies for Natural Ungaged Watersheds, Hydrology Committee, Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
5.
Hydrologic Data for Experimental Agricultural Watersheds in the United States, 1966, Agricultural Research Service, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1226, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1972.
6.
Kraijenhoff van de Leur, D. A., “Runoff Models with Linear Elements,” Recent Trends in Hydrograph Synthesis, Proceedings of Technical Meeting 21, Versl. Meded. Comm. Hydrol. Onderz. T.N.O. 13, The Hague, 1966.
7.
Linsley, R. K., Jr., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H., Hydrology for Engineers, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., 1958.
8.
“National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology,” Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1972.
9.
“Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds,” Technical Release No. 55, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., 1975.
10.
Woodward, D. E., Welle, P. I., and Moody, H. F., “Coastal Plains Unit Hydrograph Studies,” Urban Stormwater Management in Coastal Areas, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1980, pp. 99–107.
11.
Zoch, R. T., “On the Relation between Rainfall and Stream Flow,” I, II, and III, Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 62, No. 9, 1934, pp. 315–322;
Vol. 64, No. 4, 1936, pp. 105–121;
Vol. 65, No. 4, 1937, pp. 135–147.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1983
Published in print: Jun 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.