Distributed Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Inundation Model Calibration
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 2
Abstract
Uncertainties in hydrodynamic model calibration and boundary conditions can have a significant influence on flood inundation predictions. Uncertainty analysis involves quantification of these uncertainties and their propagation through to inundation predictions. In this paper the inverse problem of sensitivity analysis is tackled, in order to diagnose the influence that model input variables, together and in combination, have on the uncertainty in the inundation model prediction. Variance-based global sensitivity analysis is applied to simulation of a flood on a reach of the River Thames (United Kingdom) for which a synthetic aperture radar image of the extent of flooding was available for model validation. The sensitivity analysis using the method of Sobol’ quantifies the significant influence of variance in the Manning channel roughness coefficient in raster-based flood inundation model predictions of flood outline and flood depth. The spatial influence of the Manning channel roughness coefficient is analyzed by dividing the channel into subreaches and calculating variance-based sensitivity indices for each subreach. Replicated Latin hypercube sampling is used for sensitivity analysis with correlated input variables. The methodology identifies subreaches of channel that have the most influence on variance in the model predictions, demonstrating how far boundary effects propagate into the model and indicating where further data acquisition and nested higher-resolution model studies should be targeted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
The research of the first writer is funded by a Royal Academy of Engineering post-doctoral research fellowship.
References
Aronica, G., Bates, P. D., and Horritt, M. S. (2002). “Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE.” Hydrolog. Process., 16, 2001–2016.
Aronica, G., Hankin, B., and Beven, K. (1998). “Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data.” Adv. Water Resour., 22, 349–365.
Bates, P. D., and de Roo, A. P. J. (2000). “A simple raster-based model for floodplain inundation.” J. Hydrol., 236, 54–77.
Beven, K. (2001). “How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?” Hydrology Earth System Sci., 5(1), 1–12.
Beven, K. (2002). “Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 458, 2465–2484.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrolog. Process., 6, 279–298.
Campolongo, F., Tarantola, S., and Saltelli, A. (1999). “Tackling quantitatively large dimensionality problems.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 117 75–85.
Crosetto, M., and Tarantola, S. (2001). “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: Tools for GIS-based model implementation.” Int. J. Geograph. Inf. Sci., 15(5), 415–437.
Francos, A., Elorza, F. J., Bouraoui, F., Bidoglio, G., and Galbiati, L. (2001). “Sensitivity analysis of environmental simulation models: Investigating the behaviour of hydrological catchments.” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain, 175–179.
Homma, T., and Saltelli, A. (1996). “Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output.” Reliability Eng. Sys. Safety, 52(1), 1–17.
Horritt, M. S., and Bates, P. D. (2001). “Predicting floodplain inundation: Raster-based modelling versus the finite element approach.” Hydrolog. Process., 15, 825–842.
Horritt, M. S., and Bates, P. D. (2002). “Evaluation of 1-D and 2-D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation.” J. Hydrol., 268, 87–99.
McKay, M. D. (1995). “Evaluating prediction uncertainty.” Technical Rep. No. NUREG/CR-1150, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Ratto, M., Tarantola, S., and Saltelli, A. (2001). “Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA–GLUE approach.” Comput. Phys. Commun., 136, 212–224.
Romanowicz, R., Beven, K. J., and Tawn, J. (1996). “Bayesian calibration of flood inundation models.” Floodplain processes, M. G. Anderson, D. E. Walling, and P. D. Bates, eds., Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 333–360.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M. (2000a). Sensitivity analysis, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., and Tarantola, S. (2001). “Model-free importance indicators for dependent input.” Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain, 21–26.
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., and Campolongo, F. (2000b). “Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modelling.” Stat. Sci., 15(4), 377–395.
Sobol’, I. M. (1993). “Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models.” Math. Model. Comput. Exp., 1, 407–414.
Sobol’, I. M. (1994). A primer for the Monte Carlo method, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Tarantola, S. (2000). “Quantifying uncertainty importance when inputs are correlated.” Proc., ESREL 2000, SARS and SRA-Europe Annual Conf., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1115–1120.
Tarantola, S., Jesinghaus, J., and Puolamaa, M. (2000). “Global sensitivity analysis: A quality assurance tool in environmental policy modelling.” Sensitivity analysis, A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E. M. Scott, eds., Wiley, Chichester, U.K., 385–397.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, (1993). “River hydraulics engineer manual.” Rep. No. EM 1110-2-1416, Dept. of the Army, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 15, 2003
Accepted: Sep 9, 2004
Published online: Feb 1, 2005
Published in print: Feb 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.