Turbulence Measurements with Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 131, Issue 12
Abstract
The capability of acoustic Doppler velocimeters to resolve flow turbulence is analyzed. Acoustic Doppler velocimeter performance curves (APCs) are introduced to define optimal flow and sampling conditions for measuring turbulence. To generate the APCs, a conceptual model is developed which simulates different flow conditions as well as the instrument operation. Different scenarios are simulated using the conceptual model to generate synthetic time series of water velocity and the corresponding sampled signals. Main turbulence statistics of the synthetically generated, sampled, and nonsampled time series are plotted in dimensionless form (APCs). The relative importance of the Doppler noise on the total measured energy is also evaluated for different noise energy levels and flow conditions. The proposed methodology can be used for the design of experimental measurements, as well as for the interpretation of both field and laboratory observations using acoustic Doppler velocimeters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
A number of federal and state agencies have supported several research projects leading to this work at the University of Illinois. They are the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineering, the U.S. Geological Survey, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Illinois Water Resources Center, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The findings in this paper are the sole opinion of the writers and do not support or endorse any specific manufacturer of acoustic Doppler velocimeters. The writers thank Jim Best for his help in making the manuscript more readable as well as two anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism.
References
Anderson, S., and Lohrmann, A. (1995). “Open water test of the Sontek acoustic Doppler velocimeter.” Proc., IEEE Fifth Working Conf. on Current Measurements, IEEE Oceanic Engineering Society, St. Petersburg, Fla., 188–192.
Barkdoll, B. (2002). “Discussion of ‘Mean flow and turbulence structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation,’ by F. Lopez, and M. H. García.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 128(11), 1032.
Bendat, J., and Piersol, A. (2000). Random data. 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Gordon, L., and Cox, J. (2000). “Acoustic Doppler velocimeter performance in a laboratory flume.” NortekUSA Technical Rep., Nortek USA, San Diego.
Hamming, R. (1983). Digital filters, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Heskestad, G. (1965). “A generalized Taylor hypothesis with application for high Reynolds number turbulent shear flows.” J. Appl. Mech., 32, 735–739.
Jeffries, W., Infield, D., and Manwell, J. (1991). “Limitations and recommendations regarding the Shinozuka method for simulating wind data.” Wind Eng., 15(3), 147–154.
Kraus, N. C., Lohrmann, A., and Cabrera, R. (1994). “New acoustic meter for measuring 3D laboratory flows.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 120(3), 406–412.
Lane, S., et al. (1998). “Three-dimensional measurement of river channel flow processes using acoustic Doppler velocimetry.” Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, 23, 1247–1267.
Lemmin, U., and Lhermitte, R. (1999). “Discussion of ‘ADV measurements of turbulence: Can we improve their interpretation?’ by V. I. Nikora, and D. G. Goring.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 125(9), 987–988.
Lhermitte, R., and Serafin, R. (1984). “Pulse to pulse Doppler sonar signal processing techniques.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 1(4), 293–308.
Lohrmann, A., Cabrera R., and Kraus, N. (1994). “Acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for laboratory use.” Proc. Symp. on Fundamentals and Advancements in Hydraulic Measurements and Experimentation, ASCE, New York, 351–365.
Lopez, F., and Garcia, M. H. (2001). “Mean flow and turbulence structure of open-channel flow through nonemergent vegetation.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 127(5), 392–402.
McLelland, S., and Nicholas, A. (2000). “A new method for evaluating errors in high-frequency ADV measurements.” Hydrolog. Process., 14, 351–366.
Mercier, R. (1984). “The reactive transport of suspended particles: Mechanisms and modeling.” PhD thesis, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Nezu, I., and Nakagawa, H. (1993). Turbulence in open channel flows, IAHR, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikora, V. I., and Goring, D. G. (1998). “ADV measurements of turbulence: Can we improve their interpretation?” J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(6), 630–634.
Pope, S. (2000). Turbulent flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Roy, A., Biron, P., and Lapointe, M. (1997). “Implications of low-pass filtering on power spectra and autocorrelation functions of turbulent velocity signals.” Math. Geol., 29(5), 653–668.
SonTek. (1997). “Pulse coherent Doppler processing and the ADV Correlation.” SonTek Tech. Note, San Diego.
Shinozuka, M., and Jan, C. (1972). “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications.” J. Sound Vib., 25(1), 111–128.
Sreenivasan, K., Chambers, A., and Antonia, R. (1978). “Accuracy of moments of velocity and scalars fluctuations in the atmospheric surface layer.” Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 14, 341–359.
Voulgaris, G., and Trowbridge J. (1998). “Evaluation of the acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) for turbulence measurements.” J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 15(1), 272–288.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2005 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 6, 2004
Accepted: Mar 23, 2005
Published online: Dec 1, 2005
Published in print: Dec 2005
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.