Discrete Fluxes and Mass Balance in Finite Elements
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 1
Abstract
Significant mass balance “errors” have been reported with finite-element techniques, leading to sweeping statements that “Finite elements do not conserve mass locally.” These reports of mass balance “error” emerge when mass flux estimates are based upon post-processing of the approximated solution variables. Fluxes computed in this way appear to be nonphysical. For example, even under steady-state conditions, the flux entering and leaving a closed region may appear unequal. This has serious consequences for a typical model application that might require the estimation of flow division in a branching stream, or details about the effects of sources or sinks. In this paper, we show that by remaining consistent with the discrete approximation given by the finite-element statement, the resulting flux estimates will preserve mass balance. As a consequence, it can be shown that general finite-element approaches for hydraulic engineering do, indeed, conserve mass locally, as well as globally. These locally conservative, “consistent” flux estimates are computed for time-dependent mass conservation in one and three dimensions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Carey, G. F.(1982). “Derivative calculation from finite element solutions.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 35, 1–14.
Hughes, T. J. R., and Brooks, A. N. (1982). “A Theoretical Framework for Petrov-Galerkin Methods with Discontinuous Weighting Functions: Applications to the Streamline-Upwind Procedure.” Finite Elements in Fluids, Gallagher, R. H., ed., Vol. 4, Wiley, London, 47–64.
Hughes, T. J. R., Engel, G., Mazzei, L., and Larson, M. G.(2000). “The continuous Galerkin method is locally conservative.” J. Comput. Phys., 163(2), 467–488.
King, I. P., and DeGeorge, J. F. (1995). “Multidimensional modeling of water quality using the finite element method.” Estuarine and Coastal Modeling, Proc. 4th Int. Conf., M. L. Spalding and R. T. Cheng, eds., October 26–28, San Diego, sponsored by the Coastal Zone Management Committee of the Waterways, Ports, Coastal, and Ocean Division (WPOC) and the Computational Hydraulics Committee of the Hydraulics Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 340–354.
Kolar, R. L., Gray, W. G., and Westerink, J. J.(1996). “Boundary conditions in shallow water models: An alternative implementation for finite element codes.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 22, 603–618.
Lynch, D. R.(1984). “Mass conservation in finite element groundwater models.” Adv. Water Resour., 7 (June), 67–75.
Lynch, D. R.(1985). “Mass balance in shallow water simulations.” Commun. Appl. Numer. Methods, 1(4), 153–159.
Oliveira, A., Fortunato, A. B., and Baptista, A.(2000). “Mass balance in Eulerian-Lagrangian transport simulations in estuaries.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 126(8), 605–614.
Yeh, G.-T.(1981). “On the computation of Darcian velocity and mass balance in the finite element modeling of groundwater flow.” Water Resour. Res., 17(5), 1529–1534.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 28, 2000
Accepted: Jun 28, 2001
Published online: Jan 1, 2002
Published in print: Jan 2002
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.