Hydraulics and Design of Fusegates
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 7
Abstract
Fusegates are the mechanical equivalent of a fuse plug. A typical installation consists of multiple gates placed on a spillway crest. When installed, the gates approximate the shape of a labyrinth weir in which each gate represents one cycle of the labyrinth. The gates are held in place by gravity. For a moderate range of reservoir levels, the water flows over the fusegates as it would over a labyrinth weir. If the reservoir level exceeds some predetermined value, the fusegate overturns by rotating about its downstream edge. Each gate is set to overturn at a progressively higher reservoir elevation. For the maximum design discharge, usually equivalent to the probable maximum flood, all of the fusegates tip and the entire crest length is available to pass the flow. Fusegates are supplied by the manufacturer in three standard configurations. The empirically derived discharge coefficients for these configurations are presented. General stability equations of fusegates are derived, and the tipping moments for one configuration is shown. A procedure to design a fusegate installation is outlined and is illustrated with an example. The advantages of a fusegate over a fuse-plug installation are that operation of the system can be controlled to within a few centimeters, it acts like a labyrinth spillway for flows that are less than some critical discharge, and that the entire installation is not lost for floods less than the probable maximum flood.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Hager, W. H. (1991). “Breitkroniges Wehr—Ein versuch zur Standardisierung [broad crested weir—a standardization effort].”Wasser, Energie, Luft—Eau, Énergie, Air, Vol. 7/8, Baden, Switzerland.
2.
Hay, N., and Taylor, G.(1970). “Performance and design of labyrinth weirs.”J. Hydr. Div., 96(11), 2337–2357.
3.
Houston, K. L. (1982). “Hydraulic model study of Ute Dam labyrinth spillway.”Rep. GR-82-7, Bureau of Reclamation, Engrg. and Res. Ctr., Denver, Colo.
4.
Houston, K. L. (1983). “Hydraulic model study of Hyrum Dam auxiliary labyrinth spillway.”Rep. GR-82-13, Bureau of Reclamation, Engrg. and Res. Ctr., Denver, Colorado.
5.
Lempérière, F., and Bessiére, C. (1992). “HYDROPLUS submersible fuse gates for surface spillways.”Modification of dams to accomodate major floods; 12th Annu. USCOLD Lecture Ser., USCOLD, Fort Worth, Tex.
6.
Lux, F., and Hinchliff, D. L. (1985). “Design and construction of labryinth spillways.”15th Congress on Large Dams, Question 59, Response 15, Int. Congress of Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland.
7.
Megalháes, A. P., and Lorena, M. (1989). “Hydraulic design of labyrinth weirs.”Memória No. 736, Laboratório Nacional de Engerharia Civil, Lisbon, Portugal.
8.
Rouse, H. (1960). Elementary fluid mechanics . John Wylie & Sons, New York, N.Y.
9.
Vermeyen, T. (1991). “Hydraulic model study of Ritchard Dam spillway.”Rep. R-91-8, Bureau of Reclamation, Engrg. and Res. Ctr., Denver, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1995
Published in print: Jul 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.