Peak Discharge for Small Agricultural Watersheds
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 1
Abstract
Accurate peak discharge estimates are important when sizing highway culverts to prevent possible flood damages and to ensure economic design. The purpose of the undertaken study was to find the most acceptable peak-discharge-estimation method for use on small agricultural watersheds in Nebraska. An analysis of time of concentration t c methods was undertaken because of this parameter's importance in many peak-flow methods. Seven t c equations were compared to recorded t c values from four watersheds each less than 2 sq mi (5.18 km 2) in area. Field t c values were derived from a hyetograph-hydrograph analysis. Six peak-flow methods were then compared to the recorded peaks and historical records to find the best estimation method. Based on three storm seasons of data, a modified form of the Kirpich equation and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service average-velocity equation estimate the time of concentration adequately. Peak discharges were most closely predicted using statewide regression equations, the Fletcher method, and the rational method. Results for the 25-year event (culvert design event) tentatively support the use of statewide regression equations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beckman, E. W. (1976). “Magnitude and frequency of floods in Nebraska.”Water-Resour. Investigations 76-109, U.S. Geological Survey, Arlington, Va.
2.
Beckman, E. W., and Hutchison, N. E. (1962). “Floods in Nebraska on small drainage areas, magnitude and frequency.”Circular 458, U.S. Geolocial Survey, Washington, D.C.
3.
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., and Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Claborn, B. J., Dodson, R. D., and Barrett, D. (1990). Hands-On HEC-1, Dodson & Associates, Houston, Tex.
5.
Espey, W. H. Jr., Morgan, C. W., and Masch, F. D. (1966). “A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed.”Rep. 23 Prepared for Texas Water Development Board, University of Texas Center for Research in Water Resources, Austin, Tex.
6.
Estimating peak flow frequencies for natural ungaged watersheds—a proposed nationwide test. (1981). U.S. Water Resources Council Hydrology Committee, Washington, D.C.
7.
Fletcher, J. E., Huber, A. L., Haws, F. W., and Clyde, C. G. (1976). “Runoff estimates for small rural watersheds and development of sound design method.”Rep. No. FHWA-RD-77-158, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
8.
“Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” (1981). Bull. #17B of the Hydrol. Committee, U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C.
9.
Gupta, R. S. (1989). Hydrology and hydraulic systems, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
Hawkins, R. H.(1973). “Improved prediction of storm runoff in mountain watersheds.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., 99(4), 519–523.
11.
Hawkins, R. H.(1993). “Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data.”J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., 119(2), 334–345.
12.
Kirpich, Z. P.(1940). “Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 10(6), 362.
13.
Madramootoo, C. A., Enright, P., and Nguyen, V. (1989). “Is the rational method reliable for agricultural watersheds?”Proc., Int. Conf. on Channel Flow and Catchment Runoff; Centennial of Manning and Kuichling Rational Formula, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va., May 71–77.
14.
McCallum, B. E. (1992). “Hydrologic and hydraulic design of culverts,” MSc thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.
15.
McCuen, R. H. (1989). Hydrologic analysis and design, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
16.
National engineering handbook: section 4. (1972). U. S. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
17.
Overton, D. E., and Meadows, M. E. (1976). National Stormwater modeling, Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
18.
Potter, W. D. (1961). “Peak rates of runoff from small watersheds.”Hydr. Des. Ser. No. 2, Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C.
19.
Ramser, C. E. (1927). “Run-off from small agricultural areas.”J. Agric. Res., 34(9), Washington, D.C.
20.
Riley, T. E. (1988). “A hydrologic evaluation of twenty-four small watersheds in Nebraska,” MSc thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.
21.
Roadway design manual. (1984). Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln, Neb.
22.
Rossmiller, R. L. (1980). “The rational formula revisited.”Proc., Int. Symp. on urban Storm Runoff, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Ky,
23.
Stephenson, D. (1981). Stormwater hydrology and drainage, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, N.Y. Urban hydrology for small watersheds, technical release 55. (1986). Second Ed., U.S. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
24.
Viessman, W., Knapp, J. W., and Lewis, G. L. (1989). Introduction of hydrology, Third Ed., Harper and Row, Inc., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 121 • Issue 1 • January 1995
Pages: 36 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1995
Published in print: Jan 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.