Evaluation of Methods for Predicting Bend Loss in Meandering Channels
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 2
Abstract
The resistance to flow of a channel is increased significantly by the presence of bends or curves. Existing methods for predicting stage‐discharge relationships for meandering channels give conflicting results and none have been reliably verified with independent data. Three sets of laboratory data, including two only recently acquired, are suitable for evaluating proposed methods. Application of potentially useful methods to reproduce these data shows that ignoring bend losses gives unacceptably high errors in predicting discharge, and some proposed methods give even worse results. The simple SCS method of adjusting Manning's n on the basis of sinuousity is acceptable, although it cannot account for the effects of bend length and radius, cross‐sectional shape, or losses in individual bends. This method can be improved by linearization to remove ambiguities associated with the discontinuities in the original version. The theory proposed by Chang is verified over a wide range of conditions and gives the best results, but would be difficult to apply routinely in practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ackers, P. (1991). “The hydraulic design of straight compound channels.” Report SR 281, HR Wallingford.
2.
Agarwal, V. C., Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G. (1984). “Resistance to flow and sediment transport in curved alluvial channels.” Fourth Congress, Asian and Pacific Division, IAHR, 207–218.
3.
Chang, H. H. (1983). “Energy expenditure in curved open channels.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 109(7), 1012–1022.
4.
Chang, H. H. (1984). “Variation of flow resistance through curved channels.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 110(12), 1772–1782.
5.
Guide for selecting roughness coefficient “n” values for channels. (1963). Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agric, Washington, D.C.
6.
“Hydraulic capacity of meandering channels in straight floodways.” (1956). Tech. Memorandum No. 2‐429, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
7.
James, C. S., and Wark, J. B. (1992). “Conveyance estimation for meandering channels.” Report SR 329, HR Wallingford.
8.
Leopold, L. B., Bagnold, R. A., Wolman, M. G., and Brush, L. M. (1960). “Flow resistance in sinuous or irregular channels.” USGS Professional Paper 282‐D, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., 111–134.
9.
Mockmore, C. A. (1944). “Flow around bends in stable channels.” Trans., ASCE, 109, 593–618.
10.
Ranga Raju, K. G. (1970). “Resistance relations for alluvial streams.” La Houille Blanche, 1, 51–54.
11.
Toebes, G. H., and Sooky, A. A. (1967). “Hydraulics of meandering rivers with flood plains.” J. Wtrwys. Harb. Div., ASCE, 93(2), 213–236.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 17, 1992
Published online: Feb 1, 1994
Published in print: Feb 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.