Sediment Feed and Recirculating Flumes: Fundamental Difference
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 11
Abstract
Two standard modes of laboratory sediment transport flume operation are sediment‐feed and recirculating. In the case of uniform sediment, the final equilibriums achieved in the two modes are equivalent and independent of initial conditions, even though the specified flow and sediment constraints differ. When the sediment consists of a mixture of sizes, however, this symmetry breaks down. In a sediment‐feed flume, both the feed rate and size distribution are specified by the user, and must be identical to those of the bed load at final equilibrium. The final state thus becomes independent of initial conditions. In a recirculating flume, however, the equilibrium size distribution of neither the bed load nor the bed surface material can be specified in advance. As a result, the final state depends on the initial conditions and can include the possibility of partial transport. The equilibriums themselves are equivalent in that they obey the same laws of flow and sediment transport. Their a‐priori predictability, however, differs due to the difference in governing constraints. When fractional transport is scaled by the bulk size distribution, the two flume modes may produce very different transport relations, even for the same sediment. A consistent approach requires that the transport be scaled by the size distribution of the bed surface.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Guy, H. P., Rathbun, R. E., and Richardson, E. V. (1967). “Recirculation and sand‐feed type flume experiments.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 93(5), 97–114.
2.
Guy, H. P., Rathbun, R. E., and Richardson, E. V. (1969). “Closure to ‘Recirculation and sand‐feed type flume experiments.’” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 95(1), 454–456.
3.
Kuhnle, R. A. (1992). “Fractional transport rates of bedload on Goodwin Creek.” Dynamics of gravel‐bed rivers, P. Billi, R. D. Hey, C. R. Thorne, and P. Tacconi, eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 141–155.
4.
Jackson, W. L., and Beschta, R. L. (1982). “A model of two‐phase transport in an Oregon Coast Range stream.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 7, 517–527.
5.
Maddock, T. (1968). “Discussion of ‘Recirculation and sand‐feed type experiments.’” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 94(4), 1139–1147.
6.
Milhous, R. T. (1973). “Sediment transport in a gravel‐bottomed stream.” PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Carvallis, Oreg.
7.
Parker, G. (1990a). “Surface‐based bedload transport relation for gravel rivers.” J. Hydr. Engrg., 28(4), 417–436.
8.
Parker, G. (1990b). “The ‘acronym’ series of Pascal programs for computing bedload transport in gravel rivers.” External Memorandum M‐220, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.
9.
Parker, G. (1992). “Some random notes on grain sorting.” Proc., IAHR Grain Sorting Seminar; Mitteilungen der Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie No. 117, M. Jaeggi and R. Hunziker, eds., Zurich, Switzerland, 19–76.
10.
Parker, G., and Anderson, A. G. (1977). “Basic principles of river hydraulics.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 103(9), 1077–1087.
11.
Parker, G., Dhamotharan, S., and Stefan, H. (1982). “Model experiments on mobile, paved gravel‐bed streams.” Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1395–1408.
12.
Parker, G., and Klingeman, P. C. (1982). “On why gravel bed streams are paved.” Water Resour. Res., 18(5). 1409–1423.
13.
Peterson, A. W., and Howells, R. F. (1973). “A compendium of solids transport data for mobile boundary channels.” Rep. No. HY‐1973‐ST3, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
14.
Sutherland, A. J. (1987). “Static armour layers by selective erosion.” Sediment Transport in Gravel‐Bed Rivers, C. R. Thorne, J. C. Bathurst, and R. D. Hey, eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 243–262.
15.
Wilcock, P. R. (1992a). “Experimental investigation of the effect of mixture properties on transport dynamics.” Dynamics of Gravel‐Bed Rivers, P. Billi, R. D. Hey, C. R. Thorne, and P. Tacconi, eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 109–139.
16.
Wilcock, P. R. (1992b). “Observations of mixture transport scaled by bed surface grain size distribution.” Proc., IAHR Grain Sorting Seminar; Mitteilungen der Versuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie No. 117, M. Jaeggi and R. Hunziker, eds., Zurich, Switzerland, 93–95.
17.
Wilcock, P. R., and McArdell, B. W. (1993). “Surface‐based fractional transport rates: mobilization thresholds and partial transport of a sand‐gravel sediment.” Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 1297–1312.
18.
Wilcock, P. R., and Southard, J. B. (1989). “Bed‐load transport of mixed‐size sediment: fractional transport rates, bed forms, and the development of a coarse bed‐surface layer.” Water Resour. Res., 25(7), 1629–1641.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 11 • November 1993
Pages: 1192 - 1204
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 20, 1992
Published online: Nov 1, 1993
Published in print: Nov 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.