Assessing Time‐Variant Bridge Reliability due to Pier Scour
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 118, Issue 6
Abstract
TO prevent bridge failure due to pier scour, engineers are being asked to determine the reliability of new and existing bridges. There is currently little guidance for decision making regarding the control of scour at existing piers and the design of piers for avoiding failure due to pier scour. The purpose of this paper is to present a method to assess the risk of bridge failure due to pier scour during the life of the bridge. The analysis involves simulating pier scour for a period of time and determining the probability that the bridge will fail at various points in time during that period. A linear performance function describes the probability of bridge failure due to scour. The distributions and coefficients of variation of the random variables in the performance function are then determined by simulation, and the probability of failure is computed directly. Trie risk‐based failure analysis will enable the engineer to base bridge pier designs and scour control on an estimated probability of failure, thus providing for the safer design of bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Ang, A. H., and Tang, W. H. (1984). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Volume II—Decision, risk, and reliability. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
Ariathurai, R., and Arulanandan, K. (1978). “Erosion rates of cohesive soils.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 104(2), 279–283.
3.
Ayyub, B. M., and Haldar, A. (1984). “Practical structural reliability techniques.” J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 110(8), 1707–1724.
4.
Ayyub, B. M., and White, G. J. (1990). “Life expectancy assessment of marin structures.” Mar. Struct., 3(4), 301–317.
5.
Brubaker, K. L., and McCuen, R. H. (1990). “Level of significance selection in engineering analysis.” J. Profl. Issues Engrg., ASCE, 116(4), 375–387.
6.
Chen, Y. H., and Anderson, B. A. (1987). “Development of a methodology for estimating embankment damage due to flood overtopping.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐86/126, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
7.
Chiew, Y. M. (1984). “Local scour at bridge piers.” Report No. 355, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
8.
Cruise, J. F., and Arora, K. (1990). “A hydroclimatic application strategy for the Poisson partial duration model.” Water Res. Bull., 26(3), 431–442.
9.
Cunnane, C. (1979). “A note on the Poisson assumption in partial duration series models.” Water Resour. Res., 15(2), 489–494.
10.
Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open channel flow. Macmillan Publishers, Inc., New York, N.Y., 476–481.
11.
Johnson, P. A. (1990). “The probability of bridge failure due to pier scour.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
12.
Johnson, P. A., and McCuen, R. H. (1991). “A temporal, spatial pier scour model.” Record 1319, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
13.
Jones, J. S. (1983). “Comparison of prediction equations for bridge pier and abutment scour.” Record 950 2nd Bridge Engrg. Conf., Vol. 2, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C
14.
Laursen, E. M. (1970). “Bridge design considering scour and risk.” J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 96(2), 149–164.
15.
Lee, H.‐L., and Mays, L. W. (1983). “Improved risk and reliability model for hydraulic structures.” Water Resour. Res., 19(6), 1415–1422.
16.
McCuen, R. H. (1985). Statistical methods for engineers. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
17.
Melville, B. W. (1975). “Local scour at bridge sites.” Report No. 117, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
18.
North, M. (1980). “Time‐dependent stochastic model of floods.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 106(5), 649–665.
19.
Plate, E. J., and Duckstein, L. (1988). “Reliability‐based design concepts in hydraulic engineering.” Water Res. Bull., 24(2), 235–245.
20.
Shen, H. W., Schneider, V. R., and Karake, S. (1969). “Local scour around bridge piers.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 95(6), 1919–1939.
21.
Todorovic, P. (1978). “Stochastic models of floods.” Water Resour. Res., 14(2), 345–356.
22.
Tung, Y.‐K., and Mays, A. M. (1980). “Risk analysis for hydraulic design.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 106(5), 893–913.
23.
Yen, B. C. (1970). “Risk in hydrologic design of engineering projects.” J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 96(4), 959–966.
24.
Yen, B. C. (1987). “Reliability of hydraulic structures possessing random loading and resistance.” Engineering reliability and risk in water resources, L. Duckstein and E. J. Plate, eds., Martinus Nijoff Publishers, Boston, Mass., 95–113.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 118 • Issue 6 • June 1992
Pages: 887 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1992
Published in print: Jun 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.