Piping/Sapping Erosion. II: Identification‐Diagnosis
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 8
Abstract
Although erosion of streambanks and other shorelines by emergent seepage is widespread, this erosion mechanism (termed piping or sapping) has not been recognized as important to the overall erosion process. The mechanism is complex, and interactions with other bank and shore processes tend to mask the effects of piping/sapping. Direct evidence (water emerging from a soil face and carrying away soil particles) is rarely encountered. Several types of indirect evidence are presented and illustrated in this paper, including cavities formed by piping, deposits of dislocated particles below piping zones, blind gullies, staining produced by persistent seepage outflow, and particular types of localized failures (slab toppling, block shearing, and tensile falls caused by undercutting due to piping/sapping). The interactions of this erosion mechanism with other erosion‐deposition processes are described. The purpose of this paper is to facilitate identification and evaluation of piping/sapping erosion, particularly for relatively inexperienced field investigators.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Brunsden, D., and Kesel, R. H. (1973). “Slope development on a Mississippi River bluff in historic time.” J. Geol., 81, 576–597.
2.
Casagrande, A. (1936). “Characteristics of cohesionless soils affecting the stability of slopes and earth fills.” J. Boston Soc. Civ. Engrg., 23, 13–32.
3.
Edil, T. B., and Vallejo, L. E. (1977). “Mechanics of coastal landslides and the influence of slope parameters.” Engrg. Geol., 16, 83–96.
4.
Hadley, D. W. (1976). “Shoreline erosion in southeastern Wisconsin.” Special Report 5, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Madison, Wis.
5.
Hagerty, D. J. (1986). Summary report on Ohio River site investigations—1986. Report to Louisville District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
6.
Hagerty, D. J. (1988). “Erosion mechanisms on midwest alluvial streams.” Proc., Nineteenth Annual Conf., Int. Erosion Control Assoc., 421–434.
7.
Hagerty, D. J. (1990). Identification of erosion by piping and sapping. Report to U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss.
8.
Hagerty, D. J. (1991). “Piping/sapping erosion. I: Basic considerations.” J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 117(8), 991–1008.
9.
Hagerty, D. J., Spoor, M. F., and Ullrich, C. R. (1981). “Bank failure and erosion on the Ohio River.” Engrg. Geol., 17, 141–158.
10.
Hamel, J. V. (1983). “Geotechnical perspectives on river bank instability.” Proc., Conf. on Frontiers in Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 212—217.
11.
Jones, J. A. A., and Crane, F. G. (1984). “Pipeflow and pipe erosion in the Maesnant experimental catchment.” Catchment experiments in fluvial geomorphology, IGU Commission on Field Experiments in Geomorphology Meeting, T. P. Burt and D. E. Walling, eds., Geobooks, Norwich, U.K.
12.
Lawson, D. E. (1985). “Erosion of northern reservoir shores.” Monograph 85‐1, U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H.
13.
Palmer, H. D. (1973). “Shoreline erosion in upper Chesapeake Bay—the role of groundwater.” Shore Beach, 41(2), 19–22.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 8 • August 1991
Pages: 1009 - 1025
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1991
Published in print: Aug 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.