Variability of Empirical Flow Quantiles
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 1
Abstract
Empirical quantiles constitute a simple alternative for estimating flow values for which there is a specified nonexceedance probability. The standard error of empirical quantile estimators is a measure of the variability to be expected about the numerical estimates obtained from flow records. It is shown in this work that the standard error of empirical flow quantiles is a function of: (1) The specified probability level associated with a particular quantile; (2) the sample size used in the estimation; and (3) the probability density function governing the realization of flow variates. An example using a series of annual runoff from 1904–1986 in the American River at Folsom Reservoir, California, shows that empirical flow quantiles are efficient, i.e., have standard errors of estimates not exceeding 10% of the actual quantile value when the return periods involved are less than 100 years and the flow record is moderately large. Results from Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the approximate expression for standard error of the empirical quantile derived in this work is accurate to within of population values.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adamowski, K. (1985). “Nonparametric kernel estimation of flood frequencies.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1585–1590.
2.
Bahadur, R. R. (1966). “A note on quantiles in large samples.” Ann. Math. Statist., 37, 577–580.
3.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, A. C. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers. McGraw Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Bickel, P., and Doksum, K. (1977). Mathematical statistics, Holden Day, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
5.
Chow, V. T. (1964). Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
6.
Cruff, R. W., and Rantz, S. E. (1965). “A comparison of methods used in flood frequency studies for coastal basins in California.” Flood Hydrology, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1580, Washington, D.C.
7.
Cunnane, C. (1978). “Unbiased plotting positions—A review.” J. Hydrology, 37, 205–222.
8.
Diaz‐Granados, M. A., Valdes, J. B., and Bras, R. L. (1984). “A physically based flood frequency distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 20(7), 995–1002.
9.
Ely, L. L., and Baker, V. R. (1985). “Reconstructing paleoflood hydrology with slackwater deposits: Verde River, Arizona.” Phys. Geog., 5(2), 103–126.
10.
Harper, G. A., O'Hara, T. F., and Snooks, J. H. (1984). Probability of extreme rainfalls and the effects on the Harriman Dam, Yankee Atomic Electric Co., Framingham, Mass.
11.
Hogg, R. V., and Craig, A. T. (1978). Introduction to mathematical statistics. 4th Ed., MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
12.
Kiefer, J. (1967). “On Bahadur representation of sample quantiles.” Ann. Math. Statist., 38, 1323–1342.
13.
Kite, G. W. (1977). Frequency and risk analysis in hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colo.
14.
Kuczera, G. (1982). “Robust flood frequency models.” Water Resour. Res., 18(2), 315–324.
15.
Lehman, E. L. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks, Holden Day, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
16.
Loaiciga, H. A., and Mariño, M. A. (1988). “Fitting minima of flows via maximum likelihood.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(1), 78–90.
17.
Rao, C. R. (1973). Lincar statistical inference and its applications. 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
18.
Todorovic, P. (1978). “Stochastic models of flows.” Water Resour. Res., 14(2), 345–356.
19.
U.S. Water Resources Council (1982). “Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” Bull. 17B, U.S. Water Resour. Council, Washington, D.C.
20.
Viesmann, W., et al. (1977). Introduction to hydrology, 2nd Ed., Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., New York, N.Y.
21.
Wald, A., and Wolfowitz, J. (1940). “On a test whether two samples are from the same population.” Ann. Math. Statist., 11, 147–162.
22.
Weiss, L. (1970). “Asymptotic distribution of quantiles in some nonstandard cases.” Nonparametric Techniques in Statistical Inference, 343–348.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 115 • Issue 1 • January 1989
Pages: 82 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1989
Published in print: Jan 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.