Transformation of PMP to PMF: Case Studies
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 112, Issue 7
Abstract
There are various methods for transforming probable maximum precipitation (PMP) to probable maximum flood (PMF). Each method involves several steps during which certain assumptions have to be made and subjective judgments exercised. A number of case studies, each for a project of a different type and under different hydrologic data situations, are presented that reflect the writers' basic philosophies and experience in PMF analysis. Some conclusions regarding transformation of PMP to PMF are made based on their experiences not only from the case studies presented but also from many other projects with which they have been involved.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“A Compilation of U.S. Weather Bureau Unit Hydrographs, Part II,” National Technical Information Publication No. PB 209118, U.S. Weather Bureau, May, 1960.
2.
“Application of Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates—United States East of the 105th Meridian,” Hydrometeorological Report No. 52, National Weather Service, Washington, D.C., Aug., 1982.
3.
Benson, M. A., “Thoughts on the Design of Design Floods,” Proceedings, 2nd International Symposium in Hydrology, Fort Collins, Colo., Sept. 11–13, 1972, pp. 27–33.
4.
Buehler, B. J., “Dams in Relation to Balanced Public Safety,” presented at Engineering Foundation Conference at Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, Calif., Sept. 28–Oct. 3, 1975.
5.
Clark, C. O., “Storage and the Unit Hydrograph,” Transactions, ASCE, Vol. 110, 1945, pp. 1419–1488.
6.
Chow, V. T., Ed., “Handbook of Applied Hydrology,” Sec. 12 and 14, McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 1964.
7.
Design of Small Dams, 2nd ed., U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, D.C., 1973.
8.
Dukleth, G. W., discussion of “Re‐evaluating Spillway Adequacy of Existing Dams,” by the Task Committee on the Reevaluation of the Adequacy of Spillways of Existing Dams of the Committee on Hydrometeorology of the Hydraulics Division, Journal of the Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. HY11, Nov., 1973, pp. 2158–2159.
9.
“Flood Hydrograph Analyses and Computations,” EM 1110‐2‐1405, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Aug. 31, 1959.
10.
Fread, D. L., “DAMBRK: The NWS Dam‐Break Flood Forecasting Model,” Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Md., Jan., 1982.
11.
“Gradually Varied Unstead Flow Profills,” Generalized Computer Program, 723‐G2‐L7450, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif., Aug., 1977.
12.
Gray, D. M., Editor‐in‐Chief, “Handbook on the Principles of Hydrology,” reprinted under agreement with the National Research Council of Canada by Water Information Center, Inc., Port Washington, N.Y., 1973, pp. 8.36–8.47.
13.
“HEC‐1, Flood Hydrograph Package,” Users Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, The Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif., Sept., 1981.
14.
“HEC‐5, Simulation of Flood Control and Conservation System,” Users Manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis Calif., June, 1979.
15.
Linsley, R. K., Jr., Kohler, M. A., and Paulhus, J. L. H., “Hydrology for Engineers,” 2nd ed., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 1975.
16.
Mantellini, T., Wang, B. H., and Jawed, K., “Re‐evaluation of Design Flood for Guri Dam,” presented at the Apr., 1972 ASCE National Convention held at Las Vegas, Nev.
17.
“National Program for Inspection of Non‐Federal Dams,” ER 1110‐1‐106, Appendix D, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., Sept., 1979.
18.
“National Weather Service River Forecast System Procedures,” National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Md., 1976.
19.
Newton, D. W., and Lee, R. G., “Storms Antecedent by Major Floods,” paper presented at American Geophysical Union's 50th Annual Meeting, held at Washington, D.C., 1969.
20.
“Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105th Meridian,” Hydrometeorological Report No. 51, National Weather Service, Washington, D.C., June, 1978.
21.
“Program Description & User Manual for SSARR Model, Streamflow Synthesis & Reservoir Regulation,” U.S. Army Engineer Division, North Pacific, Portland, Ore., June, 1975.
22.
“Safety of Dams, Flood and Earthquake Criteria,” Committee on Safety Criteria for Dams, Water Science and Technology Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council, published by National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1985.
23.
Snyder, F. F., “Synthetic Unit Hydrographs,” Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, Vol. 19, Pt. 1, 1938, pp. 447–454.
24.
“Unit Hydrographs, Project CV 153, Part II, Unit Hydrograph Computations, Volume I, Civil Works Investigations,” U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., 1949.
25.
Wang, B. H., “Estimates of Probable Maximum Precipitation, Case Studies,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 10, Oct., 1984.
26.
Wang, B. H., and Revell, R. W., “Conservatism of Probable Maximum Flood Estimates,” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 3, Mar., 1983.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 112 • Issue 7 • July 1986
Pages: 547 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1986
Published in print: Jul 1986
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.